2015
DOI: 10.1159/000367751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I/II Study of Sorafenib in Combination with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Using Low-Dose Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil

Abstract: We conducted a phase I/II study in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to determine the recommended dose, as well as the safety and efficacy, of combination therapy of sorafenib with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using low dose cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Cohorts consisting of 3-6 patients with HCC received an escalated dose of CDDP and 5-FU until a maximum-tolerated dose was achieved. The treatment regimen was as follows: oral administration of sorafenib (400 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in previous combination studies with TACE, the median OS ranged from 18 months (shortest) to 32 months (longest) ( Table 1 ), suggesting that the duration of the study needs to be extremely long when evaluating OS as a primary endpoint. In clinical studies that are terminated early because of tumor progression or adverse effects, patients often receive various post-trial treatments, such as hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy [20][21][22] , ablation [23][24][25] , or systemic therapy [26][27][28][29] . In such cases, post-trial treatment likely affects OS, making it difficult to evaluate treatment outcomes using OS, especially in studies of TACE in patients with intermediate-stage HCC.…”
Section: Proposal Of a New Primary Endpoint In Tace Combination Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in previous combination studies with TACE, the median OS ranged from 18 months (shortest) to 32 months (longest) ( Table 1 ), suggesting that the duration of the study needs to be extremely long when evaluating OS as a primary endpoint. In clinical studies that are terminated early because of tumor progression or adverse effects, patients often receive various post-trial treatments, such as hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy [20][21][22] , ablation [23][24][25] , or systemic therapy [26][27][28][29] . In such cases, post-trial treatment likely affects OS, making it difficult to evaluate treatment outcomes using OS, especially in studies of TACE in patients with intermediate-stage HCC.…”
Section: Proposal Of a New Primary Endpoint In Tace Combination Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because HCC responds extremely well to locoregional therapy, it is often used as post-trial treatment even in cases in which locoregional therapy is no longer applicable and molecular targeted agents are subsequently administered in accordance with the protocol, provided that the patient's general condition is stable. This rarely happens with other types of cancer and is therefore essentially unique to HCC, owing to the availability of powerful locoregional therapies such as intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy [5][6][7], transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) [8,9], and radiofrequency ablation [10][11][12]. These post-trial treatments are capable of canceling out any difference in the primary endpoint OS by prolonging PPS [13].…”
Section: Design Of the Resorce Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reports suggested that surgical resection could be the best option for HCC patients with BCLC stage B disease. Furthermore, in some patients, TACE resistance due to the repeated TACE procedure should end up in the selection of other treatment strategies, including sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Although TACE is the most frequently selected treatment for the patients in BCLC stage B, other treatment options should be applied depending on the condition of individual patients in the clinical setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%