1986
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(86)90205-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I/II trials of WR-2721 and cis-platinum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Different otoprotective drugs have been tested, and most of them act as cell free anti-radical, among which we can include amifostine (WR 2721, acid S -2[3-aminopropylamine] ethylphosphorothiol), developed by Walter Red Army Institute, in the 50's, to protect the toxic effects of radiotherapy, without affecting the antitumoral potential. 7,8 Yuhas and Culo, 1980, were the first ones to show that amifostine promoted a reduction in nephrotoxicity induced by cisplatin, without affecting antitumor activity, which was later confirmed by the studies conducted by Glover et al, 1986 and1987. 7,9,10 Mollman et al, 1988, showed slight reduction in ototoxicity of cisplatin in patients previously treated with amifostine 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Different otoprotective drugs have been tested, and most of them act as cell free anti-radical, among which we can include amifostine (WR 2721, acid S -2[3-aminopropylamine] ethylphosphorothiol), developed by Walter Red Army Institute, in the 50's, to protect the toxic effects of radiotherapy, without affecting the antitumoral potential. 7,8 Yuhas and Culo, 1980, were the first ones to show that amifostine promoted a reduction in nephrotoxicity induced by cisplatin, without affecting antitumor activity, which was later confirmed by the studies conducted by Glover et al, 1986 and1987. 7,9,10 Mollman et al, 1988, showed slight reduction in ototoxicity of cisplatin in patients previously treated with amifostine 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This fact is explained by reduction of alkaline phosphatase activity in tumor cells, low tumor vascularization and tumor anaerobe metabolism that causes a with very low pH medium, which does not allow intracellular entry of WR1065 because it requires a ph between 6.6 and 8.2. 7,8 In the 80's, amifostine was approved by FDA to be used in patients that received cisplatin to prevent cisplatin nephrotoxicity 13 . However, its use is not recommended in cases of potentially curable tumors because the influence of cisplatin in the efficacy of chemotherapy is not exactly known yet 12,14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…503 Several preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that amifostine protects normal tissue against chemotherapy-associated toxicities without decreasing antineoplastic effects. 504,505 Animal studies suggest that amifostine scavenges hydroxyl radicals and thus markedly improves cardiac function when added to doxorubicin treatment [506][507][508] ; however, amifostine is less cardioprotective than dexrazoxane, 509 perhaps because dexrazoxane prevents the formation of radicals, whereas amifostine scavenges them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protection from CISinduced damage then occurs from this metabolite's various antioxidant actions against ROS and through proton donation to damaged DNA at the sulfhydryl sites (Culy and Spencer 2001;Treskes et al 1993). WR has been effective in ameliorating CIS-induced hematotoxicity and nephrotoxicity (Glover et al 1986) and neuropathy (Mollman et al 1988). WR's success in reducing CIS-induced ototoxicity during clinical trials is mixed, however.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our WR dose selection (18 mg/ kg) was extrapolated from human studies (Glover et al 1986(Glover et al , 1987. It is possible that our failure to ameliorate CIS's ototoxicity was due to using a dose that was too small for the hamster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%