2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40425-016-0121-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase I study with ONCOS-102 for the treatment of solid tumors – an evaluation of clinical response and exploratory analyses of immune markers

Abstract: BackgroundWe conducted a phase I study with a granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GMCSF)-expressing oncolytic adenovirus, ONCOS-102, in patients with solid tumors refractory to available treatments. The objectives of the study were to determine the optimal dose for further use and to assess the safety, tolerability and adverse event (AE) profile of ONCOS-102. Further, the response rate and overall survival were evaluated as well as preliminary evidence of disease control. As an exploratory endpoi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
179
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(81 reference statements)
3
179
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adenoviruses constitute an attractive option as oncolytic viruses, as their replication cycle is well known, present potent lytic activity, can be produced at high titres and are easily genetically modified. In the past 20 years, multiple preclinical and clinical trials have used these viruses as therapeutic agents in the treatment of different tumours [2][3][4][5][6][7] . Despite the encouraging results in terms of safety, the efficacy of adenoviral treatments still needs to be improved in order to increase the clinical usefulness of this strategy 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adenoviruses constitute an attractive option as oncolytic viruses, as their replication cycle is well known, present potent lytic activity, can be produced at high titres and are easily genetically modified. In the past 20 years, multiple preclinical and clinical trials have used these viruses as therapeutic agents in the treatment of different tumours [2][3][4][5][6][7] . Despite the encouraging results in terms of safety, the efficacy of adenoviral treatments still needs to be improved in order to increase the clinical usefulness of this strategy 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuryk and colleagues recently demonstrated that an Ad5/3 chimeric OAd armed with GMCSF (ONCOS-102) significantly reduced tumor volume when combined with pembrolizumab (anti-PD-L1) in huNOG mice (NOD/Shi-scid/IL-2Ry null ) humanized with CD34+ cord blood cells [95]. ONCOS-102 had previously shown a good safety profile and tumor control in 40% of patients in a Phase I clinical trial (NCT01598129) [96]. As the investigators found increased CD8+ T cell infiltration at patient tumor sites, as well as increased PD-L1 expression, they hoped to combine ONCOS-102 with checkpoint inhibitors and thus utilized the huNOG mouse model for preclinical testing to approximate the clinical setting.…”
Section: Humanized Mouse Models For Oad Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they showed an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and inhibitory ligands (e.g., PD-L1) in 11 out of 12 patients. These findings suggest that ONCOS-102 can be used as a priming agent that is implemented with other immunotherapies (33). As such, a phase Ib/II clinical trial is currently recruiting patients to assess the safety of ONCOS-102 combined with pemetrexed/ cisplatin; afterward, a randomized cohort will be assessed to determine if there is a correlation between clinical outcomes and immunologic data ( Table 1).…”
Section: Oncolytic Viral Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%