2020
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Ib/II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 in Combination with Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (BiTS Study)

Abstract: • A biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV schedule in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC showed equivalent efficacy with less toxicity compared with the current schedule of TAS-102 plus BEV combination. • Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination could reduce unnecessary dose reduction of TAS-102, maintain higher doses, and possibly be effective even in cases without chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). • The prespecified subgroup analysis of this study showed an obvious association between CIN within the first two cycl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, further refinements to the FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab regimen may improve its safety and/or tolerability without compromising efficacy. Recently, a simplified regimen, in which FTD/TPI was administered every 2 weeks instead of in weeks 1 and 2 of each 4-week cycle, has been found to produce less grade ≥3 neutropenia than the 'standard' FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab regimen used in the C-TASK FORCE and Danish trials (15.9 vs 72 and 67%, respectively) [20,21], but with comparable median OS (10.9 vs 11.4 and 9.4 months, respectively) [31]. Although these results are preliminary, a simplified regimen could maintain outcomes with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab while reducing hematologic toxicity, antibiotic use and the need for hematopoietic support.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, further refinements to the FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab regimen may improve its safety and/or tolerability without compromising efficacy. Recently, a simplified regimen, in which FTD/TPI was administered every 2 weeks instead of in weeks 1 and 2 of each 4-week cycle, has been found to produce less grade ≥3 neutropenia than the 'standard' FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab regimen used in the C-TASK FORCE and Danish trials (15.9 vs 72 and 67%, respectively) [20,21], but with comparable median OS (10.9 vs 11.4 and 9.4 months, respectively) [31]. Although these results are preliminary, a simplified regimen could maintain outcomes with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab while reducing hematologic toxicity, antibiotic use and the need for hematopoietic support.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab (Bev) is an alternative treatment option as a third-or later-line chemotherapy for patients with mCRC, as this treatment is safe and leads to a higher disease control rate (DCR) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), than FTD/TPI monotherapy. Nevertheless, there are only a few phase I/II (11)(12)(13) or randomized phase II trials (14) investigating the efficacy of FTD/TPI + Bev. Moreover, because the PFS following this salvage-line treatment is still low, predictors of early treatment efficacy are important to help optimize treatment strategies; however, the efficacy predictors of FTD/TPI + Bev remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that even if patients had Grade ≥ 3 CIN and could have continued panitumumab monotherapy while suspending FTD/TPI due to Grade ≥ 3 CIN, investigators may have decided to simply suspend both treatments; this would account for the low panitumumab RDI. Recently, it was reported that in heavily pre-treated patients (refractory to chemotherapy, anti-VEGF, and anti-EGFR therapy [for tumours with wild-type RAS]) biweekly administration of FTD/TPI with bevacizumab showed promising anti-tumour activity with acceptable toxicity and dramatically decreased CIN compared with the standard combination treatment schedule [20]. Thus, if panitumumab was combined with biweekly FTD/TPI, it may be possible to decrease CIN and maintain the RDI of both drugs, although additional studies are required to explore this possibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%