2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II evaluation of nivolumab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent cervical cancer (NCT02257528/NRG-GY002)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
93
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall ORR among our 18 cervical cancer patients was 22% (4/18), which is comparable to the rate of 4-26% reported in previous studies as shown in Table 4. 8,[21][22][23] The ORRs for ovarian cancer (13%) and endometrial cancer (40%) in the present study were also similar to previously reported data: 10-33% for ovarian cancer 15,16,24,25 and 13-57% for endometrial cancer 14,24,26 as shown in Table 4. Prospective clinical trials and real-world experience studies differ on a couple of points.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The overall ORR among our 18 cervical cancer patients was 22% (4/18), which is comparable to the rate of 4-26% reported in previous studies as shown in Table 4. 8,[21][22][23] The ORRs for ovarian cancer (13%) and endometrial cancer (40%) in the present study were also similar to previously reported data: 10-33% for ovarian cancer 15,16,24,25 and 13-57% for endometrial cancer 14,24,26 as shown in Table 4. Prospective clinical trials and real-world experience studies differ on a couple of points.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In CheckMate 358, a phase I/II study in patients with squamous histology only, the objective response rate was 26.3% (5/19) for cervical cancer with nivolumab [10]. Another study, with a patient population of 60% squamous histology, also reported a 4% response rate to nivolumab [11]. Although these observations are directionally consistent with the hypothesis that the clinical activity of PD-1 blockade in cervical cancer may partition with squamous histology, it is not possible to draw conclusions from small cross-study comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite having favorable immune biology, patients with cervical cancer have seen modest activity with single-agent CPIs (164,165). The Phase II nonrandomized KEYNOTE-158 study evaluated pembrolizumab in 98 patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who had progressed on or were intolerant to at least one line of standard therapy and reported an ORR of 12% (166); all responses occurred in PD-L1-positive tumors.…”
Section: Cervical Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%