2006
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.10535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II study of docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for treatment of advanced breast cancer (CHN TAX-618)

Abstract: 10535 Background: The combination of docetaxel plus epirubicin (TE) have demonstrated a significant activity in advance breast cancer (ABC) as first-line chemotherapy. In the meantime, some emerging literatures suggest that docetaxel-cisplatin (TP) combination has a powerful synergistic interaction with less cardiotoxicity. The main objectives of this multicenter study are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TE versus TP. Methods: From August 2003 to February 2005, 80 patients with at least one measurable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent randomized controlled trial of 88 Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer or MBC receiving either docetaxel-epirubicin or docetaxelcisplatin, neutropenia was reported in 67 and 54% of patients, respectively. 36 Because this was a single arm study, there was no appropriate comparative arm against which the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-paclitaxel could be compared. However, the efficacy and safety of gemcitabinepaclitaxel in this group of Chinese MBC patients appears to be comparable to that of paclitaxel monotherapy 9 and the global phase III study population in terms of overall objective response, 12-month OS and toxicity profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent randomized controlled trial of 88 Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer or MBC receiving either docetaxel-epirubicin or docetaxelcisplatin, neutropenia was reported in 67 and 54% of patients, respectively. 36 Because this was a single arm study, there was no appropriate comparative arm against which the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-paclitaxel could be compared. However, the efficacy and safety of gemcitabinepaclitaxel in this group of Chinese MBC patients appears to be comparable to that of paclitaxel monotherapy 9 and the global phase III study population in terms of overall objective response, 12-month OS and toxicity profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%