2008
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II study of short-time oxaliplatin, capecitabine and epirubicin (EXE) as first-line therapy in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer

Abstract: Epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion of 5-FU is a widely used palliative regimen in patients with gastric cancer. If cisplatin is substituted by oxaliplatin and 5-FU by capecitabine this regimen can be administered in the outpatient setting. Dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin is peripheral sensory neuropathy and it is recommended to give oxaliplatin as a 120 min infusion. However, in patients with colorectal cancer a 30 min infusion of oxaliplatin can safely be administered without increasing neuro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A potential concern with the modified doses was that efficacy may be compromised. Nevertheless, both our study and a series of other reports exploiting the same doses of capecitabine and oxaliplatin indicated that the therapeutic index was maintained [33][34][35][36][37], as outcomes were comparable with those reported with standard regimens such as DCF, EOX, and ECF. Therefore, comparative trials with the commonly employed regimens mentioned here should be carried out to better define the role of DOC in gastric cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A potential concern with the modified doses was that efficacy may be compromised. Nevertheless, both our study and a series of other reports exploiting the same doses of capecitabine and oxaliplatin indicated that the therapeutic index was maintained [33][34][35][36][37], as outcomes were comparable with those reported with standard regimens such as DCF, EOX, and ECF. Therefore, comparative trials with the commonly employed regimens mentioned here should be carried out to better define the role of DOC in gastric cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…There was a nonsignificant difference in PFS among the groups, but OS was longer in the EOX group than in the ECF group (11.2 vs. 9.9 months; p = 0.02). Recently, Schoennemann et al [28] reported a similar regimen EXE (epirubicin 50 mg/m 2 day 1, capecitabine 500 mg/m 2 twice daily continuously and oxaliplatin 130 mg/ m 2 day 1; every 3 weeks), which also showed promising results in nonresectable gastric cancer patients. Response rate was 45%, median PFS was 6.8 months, and median OS was 10.1 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…with greater toxicity and requires adequate hydration in patients with renal damage, and substituting 5-FU for capecitabine, eliminating the need for central-venous access and portable infusion pumps. 51,52 In the phase III trial, patients (n=1,002) were randomised to one of four regimens: ECF, ECX, EOF or EOX. 34 Capecitabine and oxaliplatin were found to be as effective 5-FU and cisplatin, with no significant differences in efficacy, but compared head to head, EOX was more effective than ECF.…”
Section: Doublet Regimen With S-1 Plus Cisplatinmentioning
confidence: 99%