2000
DOI: 10.3816/cbc.2000.n.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine/Doxorubicin/Paclitaxel Administered Every Other Week in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These adverse events are dose-and schedule-related with stomatitis being more frequent and severe at higher doses, while shorter dosing intervals lead to an increased incidence and severity of skin manifestations. However, in the present study, mucositis, a relatively frequent adverse event of PCX plus anthracycline plus GEM combination (Sanchez-Rovira et al, 2000;Conte et al, 2001;Zielinski et al, 2005), as well as PPE, were mild and uncommon. Moreover, neurotoxicity or cardiac toxicity, which already have been reported to complicate the PCX plus epirubicin plus GEM regimen (Sanchez-Rovira et al, 2000;Zielinski et al, 2005), were not observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These adverse events are dose-and schedule-related with stomatitis being more frequent and severe at higher doses, while shorter dosing intervals lead to an increased incidence and severity of skin manifestations. However, in the present study, mucositis, a relatively frequent adverse event of PCX plus anthracycline plus GEM combination (Sanchez-Rovira et al, 2000;Conte et al, 2001;Zielinski et al, 2005), as well as PPE, were mild and uncommon. Moreover, neurotoxicity or cardiac toxicity, which already have been reported to complicate the PCX plus epirubicin plus GEM regimen (Sanchez-Rovira et al, 2000;Zielinski et al, 2005), were not observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Conversely, in a study by Sanchez-Rovira et al (2000) almost 60% of the cycles required support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. In addition, none of the patients in our study developed febrile neutropaenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The overall response rates, including partial and complete responses, ranged from 55.2 to 82.9%, while grades III-IV neutropenia ranged from 41 to 69%. In a phase II trial conducted by Passardi and colleagues, 27% of patients required the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [20][21][22][23] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%