2002
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II trial of thalidomide in renal-cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[17][18][19][29][30][31][32] Toxicities were common and included constipation, lethargy, thrombosis, and neuropathy. 31 Despite these sometimes troublesome toxicities, the role of thalidomide was explored In that trial, there was no difference in response rates, progression free survival, or OS. Conversely, thalidomide analogues like LEN have greater potency and better tolerability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][29][30][31][32] Toxicities were common and included constipation, lethargy, thrombosis, and neuropathy. 31 Despite these sometimes troublesome toxicities, the role of thalidomide was explored In that trial, there was no difference in response rates, progression free survival, or OS. Conversely, thalidomide analogues like LEN have greater potency and better tolerability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,75 The frequency increases when thalidomide is combined with myelotoxic chemotherapy. Thrombocytopenia is rare and generally associated with neutropenia.…”
Section: Hematologic Side Effects and Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…372 In spite of some evidence pointing to the activity of thalidomide in renal carcinoma, the high toxicity of the compound at doses needed for the anti-angiogenic activity makes its use unadvisable for the treatment of this type of tumors. [373][374][375] No positive results have been obtained in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients. 376 Recent results from a phase III study show that thalidomide does not improve survival in patients receiving cranial irradiation (WBRT) for multiple brain metastases.…”
Section: O T H E R a G E N T S T H A T I N H I B I T A N G I O G E mentioning
confidence: 99%