2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase mask selection in wavefront coding systems: A design approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include both full-reference or no-reference measures of the PSF, 5, 20 the OTF, 12, 30 the MTF, 31, 32 the PTF, 33 specific images 19,34,35 or image distributions. 28 One of the most challenging issues related to optimization of hybrid imaging systems is to include the entire imaging acquisition and observation which therefore includes detector noise, image processing, and the human visual perception of the final image.…”
Section: Optimization Of Phase Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include both full-reference or no-reference measures of the PSF, 5, 20 the OTF, 12, 30 the MTF, 31, 32 the PTF, 33 specific images 19,34,35 or image distributions. 28 One of the most challenging issues related to optimization of hybrid imaging systems is to include the entire imaging acquisition and observation which therefore includes detector noise, image processing, and the human visual perception of the final image.…”
Section: Optimization Of Phase Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 the system is endowed with larger DOFs but the artefacts are more evident and the image quality is poorer. Generally, the trade-off results in an optimum PM strength given the required DOF and the characteristics of the optical system [16,17,18].…”
Section: Wavefront Coding Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design may depend on different factors: characteristics of the optical elements in the system, spectral characteristics of the scene, subjective evaluation of the invariance achieved, etc. However, in any case, given a PM shape, its strength will settle the trade-off between the amount of invariance achieved and the image degradation [16]. With this in mind, the proposed method stores and uses a list of different PMs adjusted in some manner to the values in the list of test amounts of defocus.…”
Section: Selection Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…And hence it is useful if the strength of the phase mask is to be optimized, for example to find the suitable value of α in the case of a cubic phase mask. 4 However, the definition of the evaluation function here needs to be generalized. Since the shape of the MPM is freely adaptable, it may happen that Ψ * (W 20 , φ MP M ) > Ψ * (W 20 , φ MP M ) even for W 20 < W 20 .…”
Section: Phase Mask Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, this trend is accomplished if the phase mask shape is fixed. Different shapes will perform differently and a number of shapes were previously proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%