2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase morphology and impact toughness of impact polypropylene copolymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
104
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3,9,[13][14][15] It is generally believed that the dispersed phase in hiPP exhibits a core-shell structure with PE core and EPR shell. [16][17][18][19] This coreshell structure has proven to be efficient for the toughness-rigidity balance of the material. However, the understanding of the phase morphology of hiPP is far from perfect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3,9,[13][14][15] It is generally believed that the dispersed phase in hiPP exhibits a core-shell structure with PE core and EPR shell. [16][17][18][19] This coreshell structure has proven to be efficient for the toughness-rigidity balance of the material. However, the understanding of the phase morphology of hiPP is far from perfect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no report about the role of ethylene-propylene segmented copolymer with short length of ethylene and propylene sequences in the multiple phase morphology formation. Although one does not doubt that the ethylenepropylene block copolymer (or ethylene-propylene segmented copolymer with long sequence length of PE and PP segments, as mentioned in some literature) can be considered a compatibilizer enhancing the interface adhesion between the PP matrix and the EPR dispersed phase, 6,7,17 direct evidence of the distribution of the block copolymer in the interface is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of papers on morphology of physical blends of iPP with other polymers [20][21][22][23][24][25], as well as the macroscopic relationship between structure and property of the IPCs, and it is clear that the impact properties of these polymers are influenced by the size and distribution of the rubber particles in the polymer after processing [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The final morphology of the polymer can also be influenced by processing parameters [35][36][37][38]. In our view, there is still a lack of fundamental understanding of how the molecular composition of the polymer influences the macroscopic properties of the IPCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chain structures of EPR and in particular those of EPS have strong impact on the phase separation and final mechanical properties of IPC. 4,[7][8][9][10][11][12] However, it is difficult for a conventional TSPP to tune the molecular architecture of the EPR and EPS in an independent manner because of the inherent nature of Ziegler-Natta catalysts. Very often the size of the dispersed phase domains is too large and its distribution nonuniform.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%