2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2017.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase–number uncertainty from Weyl commutation relations

Abstract: We derive suitable uncertainty relations for characteristics functions of phase and number variables obtained from the Weyl form of commutation relations. This is applied to finite-dimensional spinlike systems, which is the case when describing the phase difference between two field modes, as well as to the phase and number of a single-mode field. Some contradictions between the product and sums of characteristic functions are noted.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, since Theorem 1 involves operators of the form e iλÔ it becomes valuable when the operatorÔ does not exist itself (consequences of so called Stone-von Neumann theorem). A particularly interesting example of the number-phase uncertainty [58][59][60] (phase operators are not well defined) has just been described [61] along the lines of Theorem 1. Here we would like to briefly touch upon the broad theory of Loop Quantum Gravity [73], in which the so called Ashtekar connection [62] A i a (x) [74] plays the role of the canonical "position" variable in a field-theoretical sense [75].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since Theorem 1 involves operators of the form e iλÔ it becomes valuable when the operatorÔ does not exist itself (consequences of so called Stone-von Neumann theorem). A particularly interesting example of the number-phase uncertainty [58][59][60] (phase operators are not well defined) has just been described [61] along the lines of Theorem 1. Here we would like to briefly touch upon the broad theory of Loop Quantum Gravity [73], in which the so called Ashtekar connection [62] A i a (x) [74] plays the role of the canonical "position" variable in a field-theoretical sense [75].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%