2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase quantification in low carbon Nb-Mo bearing steel by electron backscatter diffraction technique coupled with kernel average misorientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, many martensite and austenite (M/A) islands (marked by red arrows in Figure 2 e) were observed at the BF boundaries. When the initial cooling temperature decreased to 770 °C, the longer relaxation process led to an increase in the volume fraction of PF (38%), and the pearlite phase was observed [ 22 , 23 ], as shown in Figure 2 c,f. The higher volume fraction of PF promotes the stability of the austenite, and the formation rich and poor carbon zones in austenite provides conditions for the formation of pearlite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many martensite and austenite (M/A) islands (marked by red arrows in Figure 2 e) were observed at the BF boundaries. When the initial cooling temperature decreased to 770 °C, the longer relaxation process led to an increase in the volume fraction of PF (38%), and the pearlite phase was observed [ 22 , 23 ], as shown in Figure 2 c,f. The higher volume fraction of PF promotes the stability of the austenite, and the formation rich and poor carbon zones in austenite provides conditions for the formation of pearlite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the distribution of deformation at the cutting edge of the punched sample, the kernel average misorientation (KAM), which calculates the average misorientation between the chosen pixel and its neighbors [10], was applied to analyze the local grain misorientation for studying the distribution of geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs). During the KAM analysis of this study, the first neighbor was chosen to define the kernel size of calculation, and the maximum misorientation (or exclusion angle) was selected as 5 • to ensure the intra-substructure analysis instead of inter-substructure analysis.…”
Section: Microstructure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, coincident site lattice (CSL) boundaries with HABs with low stored energy due to good atomic fit between neighboring crystals can act as crack arrester. KAM map indicates the local plastic strain variations measured between the central point and its nearest neighbors when the misorientation between them exceeds 5° in eliminating the effect of grain boundaries [44,45]. The high KAM angles appear cumulative build-up of misorientation inside the grain or the presence of sub-grain boundaries, Figures 6b and 7b.…”
Section: Crystallographic Texturementioning
confidence: 99%