2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2007.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase relations in mafic dykes and their host rocks from Kondapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India: Implications for the time–depth trajectory of the Palaeoproterozoic (late Archaean?) granulites from southern Eastern Ghats Belt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident from these data and interpretations that intrusion of charnockite-gneiss protolith must be younger than 1.37 Ga. But according to the hypothesis of charnockitic magmatism and emplacement (tonalite) followed by granulite metamorphism [17,26], the intrusion of charnockite-gneiss protolith must be older than 1.2 Ga. On the other hand, Rickers et al [10] indicated that intrusion of the charnockite-gneiss protolith is given by T DM as between 1.9 and 2.9 Ga. It is evident from the aforesaid discussions that neither the khondalites as the oldest component, nor the intrusion of charnockite-gneiss protolith into the metasedimentary granulites (supracrustals) are valid propositions.…”
Section: Geochronologymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is evident from these data and interpretations that intrusion of charnockite-gneiss protolith must be younger than 1.37 Ga. But according to the hypothesis of charnockitic magmatism and emplacement (tonalite) followed by granulite metamorphism [17,26], the intrusion of charnockite-gneiss protolith must be older than 1.2 Ga. On the other hand, Rickers et al [10] indicated that intrusion of the charnockite-gneiss protolith is given by T DM as between 1.9 and 2.9 Ga. It is evident from the aforesaid discussions that neither the khondalites as the oldest component, nor the intrusion of charnockite-gneiss protolith into the metasedimentary granulites (supracrustals) are valid propositions.…”
Section: Geochronologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…1.7 Ga". Bhui et al [26] also described "intrusion of a suite of voluminous felsic magma (protolith of enderbitic gneiss)" and Kovach et al [27] suggested that "U-Pb zircon data from the felsic magma provided the emplacement age of the felsic magma at 1.7 -1.72 Ga". Accordingly, the sediment deposition in this domain must be older than 1.7 Ga.…”
Section: Geochronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Eastern Ghats Belt that runs along the SE periphery of the Indian plate, extensive anorthositic magmatism has been recognized in previous studies (e.g. Sengupta et al, 1999;Bhui et al, 2007). The recent geological, petrological and geochemical studies on the PangidiKondapalle layered complex (Dharma Rao and Santosh, 2011) and the adjacent Chimalpahad complex (Dharma Rao et al, 2010b) have established their arc-related character.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…2; Schmitz and Bowring, 2003;Fonarev et al, 2006;Bhui et al, 2007;Santosh et al, 2007aSantosh et al, ,b, 2008Santosh, 2010;Taylor et al, 2010;Tsunogae et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2012). The cause of this UHT metamorphism is commonly ascribed to intrusion of hot magma from the mantle, but I would like to suggest the possibility that the cause was nuclear fission in localized regions.…”
Section: Effect Of Natural Fission On Thermal History Of the Earthmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Information for Voronezh from Fonarev et al (2006). Information for Eastern Ghats from Bhui et al (2007). Information for Napier province from Choi et al (2006) and Hokada et al (2008).…”
Section: Effect Of Natural Fission On Thermal History Of the Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%