2018
DOI: 10.1002/art.40579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase II Study of ABT‐122, a Tumor Necrosis Factor– and Interleukin‐17A–Targeted Dual Variable Domain Immunoglobulin, in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis With an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of ABT‐122, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)– and interleukin‐17A (IL‐17A)–targeted dual variable domain immunoglobulin, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have experienced an inadequate response to methotrexate.MethodsPatients (n = 240) were randomized to receive ABT‐122 (120 or 240 mg every week), adalimumab (40 mg every other week), or placebo in a 12‐week double‐blind, parallel‐group study. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of a placebo control group (i.e., patients who were receiving methotrexate only) did not allow for direct assessment of the magnitude of the response to ABT‐122. It is conceivable that a higher dose of ABT‐122 might have improved its efficacy; however, in a separate study conducted in patients with psoriatic arthritis, even ABT‐122 at a dosage of 240 mg every week was not associated with significant differentiation from adalimumab at 40 mg every other week . The proportions of anti‐TNF activity versus anti–IL‐17A activity of ABT‐122 are fixed, which is unavoidable with a dual inhibitor, thereby precluding the evaluation of different ratios of anti‐TNF and anti–IL‐17A activity on efficacy outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a placebo control group (i.e., patients who were receiving methotrexate only) did not allow for direct assessment of the magnitude of the response to ABT‐122. It is conceivable that a higher dose of ABT‐122 might have improved its efficacy; however, in a separate study conducted in patients with psoriatic arthritis, even ABT‐122 at a dosage of 240 mg every week was not associated with significant differentiation from adalimumab at 40 mg every other week . The proportions of anti‐TNF activity versus anti–IL‐17A activity of ABT‐122 are fixed, which is unavoidable with a dual inhibitor, thereby precluding the evaluation of different ratios of anti‐TNF and anti–IL‐17A activity on efficacy outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dual target inhibitor of IL-6R and TNFR2 was shown to inhibit synovial fibroblast proliferation and migration, osteoclastogenesis, and disease severity more effectively than single-target drugs. 46,47 Although IL-17 is a major pathogenic cytokine that can act on various inflammatory cells such as fibroblasts and macrophages, IL-21, which is also overproduced in Th17, Tfh, and Tph cells, may play a key role in the activity of antibody-secreting B cells and Tfh cells. A fusion protein targeting TNF and IL-17A was shown to be more effective than etanercept alone in a CIA mouse model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ABT-122 is an IgG1 dual-variable domain immunoglobulin (DVD-Ig) that was engineered to bind to and neutralize human TNF and IL-17A. It is built on an adalimumab backbone by adding IL-17A binding domains [ 139 , 140 , 141 ]. Although the dual inhibition of TNF and IL-17A was expected to provide greater effects compared to adalimumab, which targets only TNF, two phase 2 clinical studies have failed to demonstrate the superiority of ABT-122 for the treatment of PsA compared to adalimumab at 12 weeks [ 141 , 142 ].…”
Section: Il-23/il-17 Axis-targeting Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%