1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.64.475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase separation in thet-Jmodel

Abstract: It is shown that, for the t-J model, dilute holes in an antiferromagnet are unstable against phase separation into a hole-rich and a no-hole phase. %'hen the spin-exchange interaction J exceeds a critical value J"the hole-rich phase has no electrons. It is proposed that for I slightly less than I, the hole-rich phase is a low-density superfluid of electron pairs. A brief discussion of phase separation in other related models is given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

50
626
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 907 publications
(681 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
50
626
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We have plotted in Fig.4(a) case not shown in the figure [11]). Thus, a previous suggestion that the one hole energy in a QAF should be close to e BR [12,13] is not confirmed by our numerical results. In Fig.4(a) it is a remarkable property that all the extrapolated energies are very close to the NK energy, independent of the momentum of the hole, E ∞ = −3 ± 0.02 although the spin configuration is antiferromagnetic.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…We have plotted in Fig.4(a) case not shown in the figure [11]). Thus, a previous suggestion that the one hole energy in a QAF should be close to e BR [12,13] is not confirmed by our numerical results. In Fig.4(a) it is a remarkable property that all the extrapolated energies are very close to the NK energy, independent of the momentum of the hole, E ∞ = −3 ± 0.02 although the spin configuration is antiferromagnetic.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…An additional complication which has been neglected in this paper is the possibility of some form of hole phase separation away from half filling, due either to magnetic effects [61], electron-phonon interaction [46], or long-range Coulomb interaction (specifically, the nextnearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion, V ) [20]. In this transition, the holes bunch up in such a way that part of them remain pinned at the insulating phase at half filling.…”
Section: E Phase Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loosely speaking, this superconductivity can be understood as a consequence of the mobility of the singlet valence bonds in Fig 3: the mobile pairs of electrons behave as Cooper pairs, and their Bose-Einstein condensation leads to superconductivity. The configuration and period of the bond order can also evolve with increasing density of carriers [38,53,55], especially if the parameters are such that the physics of frustrated phase separation is important [56]. The reader is referred to Ref.…”
Section: Mobile Charge Carriersmentioning
confidence: 99%