2010
DOI: 10.1190/1.3517304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase stability via nonlinear optimization: A case study

Abstract: Accurate wavelet estimation is crucial in the deconvolution of seismic data. As per the convolution model, the recorded seismic trace is the result of convolution of the Earth's unknown reflectivity series with the propagating seismic source wavelet along with the additive noise. The deconvolution of the source wavelet from the recorded seismic traces provides useful estimates of the Earth's unknown reflectivity and comes in handy as an aid to geological interpretation. This deconvolution process usually invol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the perspective of wavelet extraction, the traditional methods include spectrum correlation (e.g. Bednar, 1983; Misra & Chopra, 2011; Otis & Smith, 1997; Rosa & Ulrych, 1991; Sacchi & Ulrych, 2000; Walden & White, 1998; White & O'Brien, 1974) and well‐log calibration (e.g. Danielsen & Karlsson, 1984; Lines & Treitel, 1985), but their estimations are time‐invariant and thus insufficient to accommodate the nonstationary seismic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of wavelet extraction, the traditional methods include spectrum correlation (e.g. Bednar, 1983; Misra & Chopra, 2011; Otis & Smith, 1997; Rosa & Ulrych, 1991; Sacchi & Ulrych, 2000; Walden & White, 1998; White & O'Brien, 1974) and well‐log calibration (e.g. Danielsen & Karlsson, 1984; Lines & Treitel, 1985), but their estimations are time‐invariant and thus insufficient to accommodate the nonstationary seismic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last seven decades, several papers on deconvolution and wavelet estimation have been published in Geophysics literature. Most often the authors focus on and try to solve problems related to the wavelet phase character (Clarke, 1968;Eisner and Hampson, 1990;Ulrych and Treitel, 1991;Lazear, 1993;Leinbach, 1995;Ursin et al, 1996;Ursin, 1998, 2000;Ursin and Porsani, 2000;Sacchi and Ulrych, 2000;Misra and Sacchi, 2007;Lü and Wang, 2007;van der Baan, 2008;Misra and Chopra, 2010;Ledesma and Porsani, 2013) The Wiener spiking deconvolution filter has been developed and applied for seismic data processing (Robinson, 1957;Robinson and Treitel, 1980;Leinbach, 1995;Yilmaz, 2001), with the assumptions that the reflectivity series have the statistical properties of random white noise and the wavelet is minimum-phase. The ability of this filter to compress the seismic wavelet in time, despite these questionable assumptions, is responsible for the popularity of the Wiener spiking deconvolution technique in the petroleum industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ledesma and Porsani (2013) uses the roots of these polynomials to obtain an optimum inverse filter via genetic algorithm. Misra and Sacchi (2007) and Misra and Chopra (2010) deconvolve the data with a standard spiking deconvolution filter. From the filtered, whitened data, they estimate an all-pass phase filter, which is then applied to the whitened data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ltered seismic trace is then an estimate of the reectivity series. Misra and Sacchi (2007) and Misra and Chopra (2010) deconvolve the data with a standard spiking deconvolution lter. From the ltered, whitened data they estimate an allpass phase lter which is then applied to the whitened data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%