2017
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.131.1217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase Structure and Heat Generation in the Co-Precipitated Magnetite Nanoparticles

Abstract: In the present studies the phase structure and magnetic ordering of magnetite nanoparticles were investigated. The powder samples were obtained by co-precipitation from Fe(III) and Fe(II) salts. SiO2 coating was performed using the modified Stöber process. X-ray diffraction studies revealed presence of the only one Fe3O4 crystalline phase both for the non-coated and SiO2-coated samples. The Mössbauer studies have shown differences in shapes of measured spectral lines for Fe3O4 particles subjected to the Stöber… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the effect of a slightly higher d b than d t for dispersions used for measurements should not be neglected. Much lower SLP values for studied AeroNPs compared to SLP measured for dispersion of bare co-precipitated Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles [38,39] and these coated with TEA-oleate [9] might be related to the smaller sizes of the 2AeroNPs-top and 2AeroNPs-bottom and their smaller agglomerates formed before coating them with TEA-oleate. The possible factor that might influence the differences in obtained SLP is the impact of TEA-oleate coating on the magnetic properties of the nanoparticles.…”
Section: Magnetic Heating Efficiency Of Aeronps Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the effect of a slightly higher d b than d t for dispersions used for measurements should not be neglected. Much lower SLP values for studied AeroNPs compared to SLP measured for dispersion of bare co-precipitated Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles [38,39] and these coated with TEA-oleate [9] might be related to the smaller sizes of the 2AeroNPs-top and 2AeroNPs-bottom and their smaller agglomerates formed before coating them with TEA-oleate. The possible factor that might influence the differences in obtained SLP is the impact of TEA-oleate coating on the magnetic properties of the nanoparticles.…”
Section: Magnetic Heating Efficiency Of Aeronps Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As shown in Figure 10, the TEA-oleate coating caused a significant reduction of the magnetic moment (M) of NPs. Furthermore, SLP measurements reported in [9,38,39] were performed for NPs dispersed in glycerol, which can alter the relaxation mechanism in NPs subjected to high-frequency external magnetic fields. The ILP(f ) dependencies were of the same order of magnitude for both H = 5 kA/m and H = 15 kA/m.…”
Section: Magnetic Heating Efficiency Of Aeronps Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heating efficiencies of the magnetite nanoparticles dispersions in a glycerol and specific loss powers (SLP) were determined for dispersion of nanoparticles produced using both methods as well as for Fe 3 O 4 sample kept in glycerol for 18 months. The details of self-constructed setup for measurements of heating efficiency of nanoparticle dispersions was widely described in [7].…”
Section: Samples Preparation and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose it is rather difficult to compare results obtained in various labs. Therefore, in the present studies two different processing routes that were described in papers [4,7], which led to obtain nanoparticles of various crystallite sizes were used. Furthermore, the phase constitution plays also an important role in the performance of nanoparticle dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%