2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2006.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase synchrony and coherence analyses of EEG as tools to discriminate between children with and without attention deficit disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is just a little better than a pure guess. This performance is very similar to the result found based on phase synchrony processing of eyes closed EEG [23], an entirely different approach than GMM-UBM. As the performance of a KNN approach [4] was also good when using ANT data, improved detection performance appears to be highly correlated with using an attention task instead of the eyes closed condition.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is just a little better than a pure guess. This performance is very similar to the result found based on phase synchrony processing of eyes closed EEG [23], an entirely different approach than GMM-UBM. As the performance of a KNN approach [4] was also good when using ANT data, improved detection performance appears to be highly correlated with using an attention task instead of the eyes closed condition.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…9,10 Similarly, EEG phase synchronization and coherence have been used to diagnose attention deficit disorder in children. 11 In behavioral studies, synchronization measurement has been useful in assessing coordination between individuals during interpersonal interaction (e.g., conversation, dance); [12][13][14] for tutorials, see Refs. 15 and 16.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, CTS analysis provides a measure of phase coherence that can be applied to quantify EEG phase coherence changes due to experimentally controlled stimuli in clinically relevant frequencies that may be applicable to differentiating between patients with and without neurological disorders (Farmer, 2002; Tcheslavski & Beex, 2006; Doesburg, 2009). In contrast to traditional wavelet analysis, CTS can be applied to sparse data, similar to discrete Fourier transform (DFT), as long as the data satisfy the restrictions of the Nyquist theorem (Nyquist, 1928).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%