2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2020.106376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase transformation in boron under shock compression

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, the initial states are estimated by starting from DFT calculations at the desired densities (2.20, 2.65, and 4.29 g/cm 3 for fused silica, α-quartz, and stishovite, respectively) 49 , then we consider each isotherm with temperature T and fit the pressure and energy data along the isotherm as functions of density by using cubic splines 50 , and the density ρ at which the energy term [E − E i ] equals the pressure term [(P + P i )(V i − V )/2] defines the Hugoniot, which has definitive values in T, ρ, P and E. We also calculate the shock velocity u s and particle velocity u p , relevant to shock experiments, by u 2 s = ξ/η and u 2 p = ξη, where ξ = (P −P i )/ρ i and η = 1−ρ i /ρ. This approach has been used previously for calculating the Hugoniot of several other materials [51][52][53][54][55][56][57] , and was found to produce consistent Hugoniots with other computational methods, such as progressive determination by running a large number of EOS calculations around the Hugoniot curve 58,59 In order to cross check the validity of the Hugoniot results based on the relatively sparse temperature-density grid, we have recalculated the Hugoniot of α-quartz by performing 2D interpolation of the pressure and energy data as functions of (T, ρ) and then determined the conditions at which the function H(ρ, T ) = E − E i + (P + P i )(V − V i )/2 equals zero. We have also made tests by using a partial set of our EOS data (by excluding the 6.62 g/cm 3 isochore).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the initial states are estimated by starting from DFT calculations at the desired densities (2.20, 2.65, and 4.29 g/cm 3 for fused silica, α-quartz, and stishovite, respectively) 49 , then we consider each isotherm with temperature T and fit the pressure and energy data along the isotherm as functions of density by using cubic splines 50 , and the density ρ at which the energy term [E − E i ] equals the pressure term [(P + P i )(V i − V )/2] defines the Hugoniot, which has definitive values in T, ρ, P and E. We also calculate the shock velocity u s and particle velocity u p , relevant to shock experiments, by u 2 s = ξ/η and u 2 p = ξη, where ξ = (P −P i )/ρ i and η = 1−ρ i /ρ. This approach has been used previously for calculating the Hugoniot of several other materials [51][52][53][54][55][56][57] , and was found to produce consistent Hugoniots with other computational methods, such as progressive determination by running a large number of EOS calculations around the Hugoniot curve 58,59 In order to cross check the validity of the Hugoniot results based on the relatively sparse temperature-density grid, we have recalculated the Hugoniot of α-quartz by performing 2D interpolation of the pressure and energy data as functions of (T, ρ) and then determined the conditions at which the function H(ρ, T ) = E − E i + (P + P i )(V − V i )/2 equals zero. We have also made tests by using a partial set of our EOS data (by excluding the 6.62 g/cm 3 isochore).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, experimental variables such as the temperature and compression mechanism (static vs. dynamic) can affect the phases that are formed. For boron, in particular, discrepancies between the measured and calculated shock Hugoniot, as well as the computed melting temperatures suggest that new post-α-Ga phases can be formed at megabar pressures [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Various stable and metastable polymorphs of elemental boron have been proposed as superhard [8][9][10], superconducting [11][12][13][14], and even topological materials [15]. Furthermore, because of its higher density and tensile strength as compared to plastics, this low-Z material offers an option as an ablator in inertial confinement fusion and high energy density experiments, and its phase behavior as a function of temperature and pressure is of extreme interest [16,17]. The structural chemistry of boron, including metastable phases that could be created in experiment, must be understood in order to accurately model its behavior under such conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent work by Polsin et al 11 , in situ XRD were utilized to detect the crystal structure of Aluminum (Al) under ramp compression loading. The authors found out that a solid–solid phase transition, consistent with a transformation to a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) structure, occurs at around 216 GPa, while a transformation to a structure consistent with the body-centered cubic (bcc) structure occurs at 320 GPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%