2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/702/1/012002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase transition to the Fulde–Ferrell–Larkin–Ovchinnikov state in a quasi-one-dimensional organic superconductor with anion order

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, for most practical purposes, we can regard the Fermi surfaces as touching when q is optimized.Figure5also shows that the points at which the Fermi surfaces touch are far away from k y = π/2, near which the anion order affects the electron dispersion. Hence, the anion order would not significantly change the present result 29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, for most practical purposes, we can regard the Fermi surfaces as touching when q is optimized.Figure5also shows that the points at which the Fermi surfaces touch are far away from k y = π/2, near which the anion order affects the electron dispersion. Hence, the anion order would not significantly change the present result 29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Hence, the anion order would not significantly change the present result. 29) Discussion -The discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental results is due to the simplifications in the present theory and lack of accurate information on the model parameters. For example, although the optimum direction of H depends on the magnitude of the magnetic field in the experimental observations, that is not so in the present theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. We consider this model because it includes an approximate model of (TMTSF) 2 ClO 4 , 26,36,37) where the anion order 38,39) is ignored. When the molecules are dimerized, the sites A and B are inequivalent, and each pair of adjacent sites A and B constitutes a lattice site.…”
Section: Model and Typical Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies based on a model for (TMTSF) 2 ClO 4 that involves four FSs suggested several pairing states [25,26,37,47,48,50,51], such as a nodeless d-wave, nodal d-wave, and nodal g-wave states. Note that the "symmetry" of the d(p)-wave and s(f )-wave gaps are the same in the system on which we focus herein; however, we call these states d(p)-wave and s(f )-wave gaps in the broad sense, meaning that the sign of the gap changes along the FS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%