2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Phase transitions” in small systems: Why standard threshold definitions fail for nanolasers

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(211 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this threshold regime, a progressive growth in the coherent field caused by the stimulated emission was observed [ 97 ]. Such a progressively smoother transition was more frequently observed in a micro-/nano-laser than in a macroscopic laser [ 98 ]. A further statistical analysis of the fluctuation correlation among the above RL spectrum replicas resulted in a replica symmetry breaking (RSB) observation around the threshold [ 99 ].…”
Section: Rl Emission Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this threshold regime, a progressive growth in the coherent field caused by the stimulated emission was observed [ 97 ]. Such a progressively smoother transition was more frequently observed in a micro-/nano-laser than in a macroscopic laser [ 98 ]. A further statistical analysis of the fluctuation correlation among the above RL spectrum replicas resulted in a replica symmetry breaking (RSB) observation around the threshold [ 99 ].…”
Section: Rl Emission Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy indicates the deviation of the microlaser behavior from the thermodynamic limit, which applies quite satisfactorily to macroscopic lasers. 1,30 At the same time, this immediately highlights an issue for the interpretation of experimental data. Being compelled to infer the threshold position from experimental results by selecting the point where g (n) (0) = n!…”
Section: Noise-free Laser Signal Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…26 Nevertheless, certain critical threshold features were identified early on [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and have since been the subject of lively debate. [34][35][36] Only recently has the concept of threshold definition been broadened to acknowledge that at the micro-and nanoscale, there are multiple definitions that pertain to separate points, contingent upon the quantity being analyzed 1,37 Advanced quantum mechanical models are now emerging in a context where quantum effects are significant due to the small scale, despite the averaging over tens of active emitters interacting with a cavity which possesses a limited number of resonant modes. [38][39][40][41] One significant factor in understanding the physics of laser threshold at the nanoscale, and the microscale as well, is the constraints related to measurement techniques.…”
Section: Physical Peculiarities Of Nanolasersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By separating different channel emissions, the S-S model allows for more accurate analysis of laser dynamics. In addition, although the conventional rate equations possess the indubitable merit of providing a wealth of information about laser dynamics, they fail to simulate the dynamics around threshold region, in particular for high-β lasers, since people just introduce the averaged background noisy field into the lasing mode [39]. This incorrect description may also lead people to overlooking the threshold region without any further consideration.…”
Section: Computational Concept and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%