2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.075335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase transitions of a few-electron system in a spherical quantum dot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, using Table I and Eq. (7), the CF magic numbers in the interval 15 ≤ L ≤ 45 (m = 1) are found to be the following nine, 67 15, 21,25,27,30,33,35,39,45.…”
Section: A Predictions Of Magic Angular Momentamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, using Table I and Eq. (7), the CF magic numbers in the interval 15 ≤ L ≤ 45 (m = 1) are found to be the following nine, 67 15, 21,25,27,30,33,35,39,45.…”
Section: A Predictions Of Magic Angular Momentamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4,6 Numerical computations of the ground-and excited-state energies of the three-electron harmonium atom have also been carried out, involving methods ranging from the HartreeFock approximation 21 and low-level electron-correlation approaches 22 to Monte Carlo calculations 23 and the full configuration interaction (FCI) employed in conjunction with extrapolation to the complete basis set (CBS). 24 The FCI/CBS study, in which approximate energies of the 2 P − and 4 P + states have been computed for 12 values of ω between 0.1 and 1000.0, has uncovered both advantages and disadvantages of using uncorrelated Gaussian basis sets in electronic structure calculations on harmonium atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice, however, that Ref. 51 obtained an incomplete wave function, since the companion step of restoration of the rotational symmetry was not considered (see section VI below).…”
Section: 49mentioning
confidence: 99%