2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1814965116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phasor histone FLIM-FRET microscopy quantifies spatiotemporal rearrangement of chromatin architecture during the DNA damage response

Abstract: To investigate how chromatin architecture is spatiotemporally organized at a double-strand break (DSB) repair locus, we established a biophysical method to quantify chromatin compaction at the nucleosome level during the DNA damage response (DDR). The method is based on phasor image-correlation spectroscopy of histone fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)-Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy data acquired in live cells coexpressing H2B-eGFP and H2B-mCherry. This multiplexed approach ge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, FLIM-FRET also provides accurate quantification due to the independence of the fluorescence lifetime from the relative concentrations of the interacting proteins, and is independent of their diffusion rates (Llères et al, 2007). In conclusion, our assay measures close contacts in the nuclear space between distant nucleosomes, and thus provides a read-out of nanoscale chromatin compaction (Lou et al, 2019;Sobecki et al, 2016;Baarlink et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Nanoscale Chromatin Compaction Is Decreased In Set-2 Mutant mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Importantly, FLIM-FRET also provides accurate quantification due to the independence of the fluorescence lifetime from the relative concentrations of the interacting proteins, and is independent of their diffusion rates (Llères et al, 2007). In conclusion, our assay measures close contacts in the nuclear space between distant nucleosomes, and thus provides a read-out of nanoscale chromatin compaction (Lou et al, 2019;Sobecki et al, 2016;Baarlink et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Nanoscale Chromatin Compaction Is Decreased In Set-2 Mutant mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Our estimation of the average interaction distance might be inaccurate, as it does not rely on a robust calibration protocol. In this respect, we believe it would be interesting to perform a similar analysis on the histone‐based FRET assays where the use of fluorescent proteins would allow a more robust calibration with constructs of known stoichiometry and a direct estimation of the average nanometer distance between labeled histones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This FRET assay has been used to reveal distinct domains and quantitatively discriminate different levels of nanoscale chromatin compaction in live HeLa cells and in living Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system . More recently, the same FRET assay has been applied to measure chromatin organization in live cells in combination with the phasor analysis of FLIM . Coupling this technology with laser microirradiation allowed identifying the DDR‐dependent chromatin architectural changes that occur in response to DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To interrogate the chromatin network organization within an intact nucleus and define the role this structural framework plays in nuclear factor navigation, two perspectives of investigation have emerged. The first approach is to directly study chromatin organization using electron microscopy [12], super-resolution optical microscopy [13][14][15], histone FRET microscopy [16][17][18][19], or techniques based on high throughput identification of DNA sequences that are in spatial proximity to one another in the nucleus [20][21][22][23][24]. The second perspective is to indirectly probe chromatin organization from the point of view of the molecules exploring this complex environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%