Phd Students' Awareness of Research Misconduct

Bošković, Miloš; Djoković, Jelena M.; Grubor, Iva; Guzvic, Vladimir; Jakovljevic, Bozidar; Jurišević, Milena; Ljubisic, Danijela; Mijajlovic, Marina; Milicevic, Ivana; Milovanović, M. V.; Nikolić, L; Nikolić, Miloš; Peric, Sasa; Petrovic, Ana; Petrović, Jelena; Radonjić, Katarina; Simonovic, Ljubica; Simovic, Marko; Stojanovic, Stefan; Milosavljevic, Isidora; Tomović, Jovica; Vranic, Sandra; Vucicevic, Ksenija; Zdravkovic, Andjela; Janković, Slobodan

doi:10.1525/jer.2013.8.2.163

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Explicit teaching in research methods courses about resultant harms from these behaviors may help foster a climate where research misconduct is viewed as unacceptable. For example, Boskovic et al (2013) trialed discussion groups on research misconduct with Ph.D. students. The role of research mentors ( Wocial, 1995 ; Wright et al, 2008 ; Kornfield, 2012 ) and supervisors ( Mitchell and Carroll, 2008 ) in educating students about research integrity has also been stressed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned Behavior

Rajah-Kanagasabai

Roberts

2015

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined the utility of the Theory of Planned Behavior model, augmented by descriptive norms and justifications, for predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students. A convenience sample of 205 research active Western Australian university students (47 male, 158 female, ages 18–53 years, M = 22, SD = 4.78) completed an online survey. There was a low level of engagement in research misconduct, with approximately one in seven students reporting data fabrication and one in eight data falsification. Path analysis and model testing in LISREL supported a parsimonious two step mediation model, providing good fit to the data. After controlling for social desirability, the effect of attitudes, subjective norms, descriptive norms and perceived behavioral control on student engagement in research misconduct and questionable research practices was mediated by justifications and then intention. This revised augmented model accounted for a substantial 40.8% of the variance in student engagement in research misconduct and questionable research practices, demonstrating its predictive utility. The model can be used to target interventions aimed at reducing student engagement in research misconduct and questionable research practices.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned Behavior

Rajah-Kanagasabai

Roberts

2015

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As well as in this regard, other practical policies have been proposed: Providing the guidelines on good practice, encouragement of research and teaching, clarification of research codes, integrity promotion, dishonestly prevention, ethical counseling supports, protection around the difficult analysis of data, commitment to professional authorship, clearance of the conflict of interests, attention to the details informed consent, and a dozen other issues. [ 1 23 24 ]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A proposed strategy for research misconduct policy: A review on misconduct management in health research system

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Today, with the rapid growth of scientific production, research misconduct has become a worldwide problem. This article is intended to introduce the successful experience on the management of research paper misconducts in the field of health research.Methods:Our aim was to design and develop the strategy for research misconduct policy. Focusing on the national regulatory system, we developed a hierarchical model for paper misconduct policy in all the medical sciences universities and their affiliated research units.Results:Through our regulatory policy for paper misconduct management, specific protocol was followed in the field of health research publications through which the capabilities of covering the four main elements of prevention, investigation, punishment, and correction have come together.Conclusions:Considering the proposed strategy, regarding the strengths and weaknesses, utilization of evaluation tool can be one of the best strategies to achieving the prospective of health research papers by 2025.

show abstract

Phd Students' Awareness of Research Misconduct

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned Behavior

Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned Behavior

A proposed strategy for research misconduct policy: A review on misconduct management in health research system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About