2017
DOI: 10.1142/s0217751x17500506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenomenology of the new physics coming from 2HDMs to the neutrino magnetic dipole moment

Abstract: In several frameworks for leptons-sectors of two Higgs doublet models, we calculate the magnetic dipole moment for the different flavor types of neutrino. Computations are carried out by assuming a normal hierarchy for neutrino masses, and analyzing the process ν → νγ with a charged Higgs boson into the loop. The analysis was performed by sweeping the charged Higgs mass and taking into account the experimental constraints for relevant parameters in Two Higgs Doublet Models with and without flavor changing neut… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution to the MDM due to the presence of magnetic fields is below the SM contribution for all models (with and without natural flavor conservation). Furthermore, as our recent work has showed [4], contributions from magnetic fields are less than those obtained in the vacuum for the models considered. As it happens in analyses from vacuum for MDM, there is a strong relationship among MDM, neutrino and charged lepton masses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The contribution to the MDM due to the presence of magnetic fields is below the SM contribution for all models (with and without natural flavor conservation). Furthermore, as our recent work has showed [4], contributions from magnetic fields are less than those obtained in the vacuum for the models considered. As it happens in analyses from vacuum for MDM, there is a strong relationship among MDM, neutrino and charged lepton masses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%