2008
DOI: 10.1086/587795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenomenology of Turbulent Dynamo Growth and Saturation

Abstract: International audienceWith a nonlocal shell model of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence we investigate numerically the turbulent dynamo action for low and high magnetic Prandtl numbers (Prm). The results obtained in the kinematic regime and along the way to dynamo saturation are understood in terms of a phenomenological approach based on the local ( ) or nonlocal ( ) nature of the energy transfers. In both cases, the magnetic energy grows at a small scale and saturates as an inverse “cascade.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With hydrodynamic turbulence intermittency 2 , the She & Leveque (1994) phenomenology provides the value ζ 1 = 1/9+2(1−(2/3) 1/3 ) ≈ 0.364 and then the small-scale dynamo phenomenology gives β = β ≈ 0.466, in agreement with the numerical result of Stepanov & Plunian (2008). In our simulations, the values we obtain for ζ 1 (shown in Table 1 and computed from ten independent runs with ν = η = 10 −10 ) are closer to the She & Leveque 1994 value than to onethird (no intermittency), although both are within 3-σ error bars.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With hydrodynamic turbulence intermittency 2 , the She & Leveque (1994) phenomenology provides the value ζ 1 = 1/9+2(1−(2/3) 1/3 ) ≈ 0.364 and then the small-scale dynamo phenomenology gives β = β ≈ 0.466, in agreement with the numerical result of Stepanov & Plunian (2008). In our simulations, the values we obtain for ζ 1 (shown in Table 1 and computed from ten independent runs with ν = η = 10 −10 ) are closer to the She & Leveque 1994 value than to onethird (no intermittency), although both are within 3-σ error bars.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The α exponent in T m controls the strength of long-range (in Fourier space) nonlinear interactions: following Stepanov & Plunian (2008), we use α = −1 for strong nonlocal interactions, and α = −5/2 for weak nonlocal interactions; α = −∞ would correspond to no nonlocal interactions, i.e., to a local model.…”
Section: Model Equations and Numerical Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large Pm, E b (k)/E u (k) grows monotonically with k, but it decreases with k for small Pm due to the nature of energy spectra described in the last two sections. Our results are in general agreement with the results of Stepanov and Plunian [35]. Note that the inertial range in our simulation is broader because our viscosity and the magnetic diffusivity are smaller than those of Stepanov and Plunian [35].…”
Section: Dynamo With Large Prandtl Numberssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the shell model of Frick et al [33], dB n /dt does not involve U n at all, while the shell model of Plunian and Stepanov [34] includes nonlocal terms. In the shell model of Stepanov and Plunian [17], Lessinnes et al [18], and Stepanov and Plunian [35], the structures of N n [B, B] and N n [U, U ] are the same, and so are those of N n [U, B] and N n [B, U ]. As a result, these models do not yield correct magnetic-to-magnetic energy transfers (B2B) due to N n [U, B], as well as magnetic-to-velocity (B2U ) and velocityto-magnetic (U 2B) transfers arising due to N n [B, B] and N n [B, U ].…”
Section: Description Of Our Mhd Shell Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that our shell model considers local interactions between shells, namely, each shell interacts only with the first two neighbor shells on each side. At large Pm it is known that non-local interactions give an important contribution in the magnetic energy spectrum at small-scales [42][43][44]. This contribution, due to non-local interactions, was estimated by Plunian and Stepanov using a non-local shell model [43].…”
Section: Dynamical Runsmentioning
confidence: 99%