The rate of bacterial photoinactivation in plasma by methylene blue (MB), especially for Gram-negative bacteria, has been reported to be lower, by about an order of magnitude, than the rate of inactivation in PBS and water solutions. This low inactivation rate we attribute to the bleaching of the 660-nm absorption band of MB in plasma that results in low yields of MB triplet states and consequently low singlet oxygen generation. We have recorded the change of the MB 660-nm-band optical density in plasma, albumin, and cysteine solutions, as a function of time, after 661-nm excitation. The transient triplet spectra were recorded and the singlet oxygen generated in these solutions was determined by the rate of decrease in the intensity of the 399-nm absorption band of 9, 10-anthracene dipropionic acid. We attribute the bleaching of MB, low singlet oxygen yield, and consequently the low inactivation rate of bacteria in plasma to the attachment of a hydrogen atom, from the S-H group of cysteine, to the central nitrogen atom of MB and formation of cysteine dimer.ADPA | photoinactivation deficiency | Leuco methylene blue | electrophilic attack | transient spectroscopy E ven though infections from bacterially contaminated plasma are thought to be very few (1) and the frequency of patient sepsis caused by transfusion of blood contaminated by bacteria is as low or less than the transfusion-associated hepatitis C virus infection (2), the possibility of such infection cannot be entirely discounted in view of the fact that new or even more resistant strains of known bacteria are being encountered. To a large extent, pooled human plasma is sterilized by the solvent-detergent method (3-5), whereas single-donor human plasma is often decontaminated by methylene blue (MB) photoexcitation, which generates reactive oxygen species that safely inactivate many viruses (6, 7). However, several Gram-positive and especially Gram-negative bacteria are found to be very resistant to photoinactivating agents such as porphyrins and thiazine dyes, possibly because the outer walls of Gram-negative bacteria, such as Serratia marcescens (SM), are composed of negatively charged lipopolysaccharides, which are resistant to photoinactivation by these dyes (8).Gram-positive bacteria and several Gram-negative bacteria are relatively easily inactivated, especially in high-pH MB-PBS solutions, after irradiation with 661-nm light for a rather short period, i.e., 10 min (9). Gram-negative bacteria usually require longer exposure times for inactivation. Table 1 lists the time required for the inactivation of two representative bacteria, coagulasenegative Staphilcocci, CoNS (Gram-positive) and SM (Gramnegative). Inactivation of bacteria dispersed in PBS at pHs 7 and 9 occurs within 20 min or less; however, note that when the same concentration of bacteria, 10 7 /mL, was dispersed in a solution of human plasma containing 2 × 10 −5 M MB and irradiated with the same photon flux of 6.8-mW, 661-nm light-emitting diode (LED) light, the inactivation rate was found ...