1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02628501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and cytological variation among plants derived from anther cultures ofLilium longiflorum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study showed that picloram is suitable for inducing yellowish nodular calluses in anther cultures of the cultivar 'Connecticut King', whereas 2,4-D had no effect on nodular callus production in anthers from both field-and greenhouse-grown plants, although it has been used for producing haploids in anther cultures of other Lilium species (Gu and Cheng, 1982;Qu et al 1988). It has already been reported that picloram gave better results than 2,4-D for both callus induction and subsequent morphogenesis in several Liliaceous species: somatic embryogenesis from leaf sections of Gasteria and Haworthia (Beyl and Sharma, 1983), and callus formation and plant regeneration from shoot tips of Allium cepa (Phillips and Luteyn, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study showed that picloram is suitable for inducing yellowish nodular calluses in anther cultures of the cultivar 'Connecticut King', whereas 2,4-D had no effect on nodular callus production in anthers from both field-and greenhouse-grown plants, although it has been used for producing haploids in anther cultures of other Lilium species (Gu and Cheng, 1982;Qu et al 1988). It has already been reported that picloram gave better results than 2,4-D for both callus induction and subsequent morphogenesis in several Liliaceous species: somatic embryogenesis from leaf sections of Gasteria and Haworthia (Beyl and Sharma, 1983), and callus formation and plant regeneration from shoot tips of Allium cepa (Phillips and Luteyn, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Establishment of homozygous lines through in vitro culture could also provide additional means for improvement of lilies with respect to floral and marketable qualities. Haploid or doubled haploid plants of lilies have already been produced in vitro: haploids of L. longiflorum were obtained by anther culture but haploidy was lost after four to six subcultures of them (Sharp et al, 1971), haploid, diploid and aneuploid plantlets were regenerated from anther cultures of L. davidii (Gu and Cheng, 1982), gynogenic doubled haploid Plantlets were regenerated from unfertilized ovules of the Oriental hybrid lily 'Leraza' (Prakash and Giles, 1986); and diploid and mixoploid (with up to 80% haploid cells) plants were regenerated from anther cultures of several L. longiflorum genotypes (Qu et al, 1988). However, an efficient and reproducible system for producing a large number of haploid lily plants has not yet been developed, and production of haploid plants has been restricted to only a few species and cultivars described above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological variation of regenerants was recorded in the height of regenerants, leaf size, shape, and length:width ratio, and fruit size, among other factors (Qu et al 1988;Kiss et al 2001;Kozik et al 2002;Rimberia et al 2006). Cytological differences recorded in in vitro regenerants included aneuploidy, haploidy, diploidy, triploidy, tetraploidy, octoploidy, nanoploidy, dodecaploidy, and mixoploidy (Ockendon 1998;Kim et al 2003;Rimberia et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ornamental plants, variation among plants derived from anther cultures was recorded in Lilium longiflorum (Qu et al 1988;Arzate-Fernández et al 1997), Asiatic hybrid lily (Han et al 1997), Helianthus annuus L. 'Morden' (Thengane et al 1994;Saji and Sujatha 1998), Dianthus chinensis L. (Fu et al 2008), and Gentiana triflora (Doi et al 2010). In other horticultural plants, variation was reported in Daucus carota (Kozik et al 2002), Citrus clementina Hort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation