2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep11658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and evolutionary implications of modulating the ERK-MAPK cascade using the dentition as a model

Abstract: The question of phenotypic convergence across a signalling pathway has important implications for both developmental and evolutionary biology. The ERK-MAPK cascade is known to play a central role in dental development, but the relative roles of its components remain unknown. Here we investigate the diversity of dental phenotypes in Spry2−/−, Spry4−/−, and Rsk2−/Y mice, including the incidence of extra teeth, which were lost in the mouse lineage 45 million years ago (Ma). In addition, Sprouty-specific anomalies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their expression is induced upon growth factor stimulation, and the protein products inhibit FGFR‐mediated activation of the ERK‐MAPK signaling pathway . In the mouse, Spry2 and Spry4 prevent the development of supernumerary teeth, and Spry1 , Spry2 , and Spry4 are required for correct molar cusp patterning . In the mouse incisor, which is a continuously growing tooth, Spry2 and Spry4 restrict the differentiation of enamel‐secreting ameloblasts to the labial side, allowing asymmetric enamel deposition …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their expression is induced upon growth factor stimulation, and the protein products inhibit FGFR‐mediated activation of the ERK‐MAPK signaling pathway . In the mouse, Spry2 and Spry4 prevent the development of supernumerary teeth, and Spry1 , Spry2 , and Spry4 are required for correct molar cusp patterning . In the mouse incisor, which is a continuously growing tooth, Spry2 and Spry4 restrict the differentiation of enamel‐secreting ameloblasts to the labial side, allowing asymmetric enamel deposition …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17) In the mouse, Spry2 and Spry4 prevent the development of supernumerary teeth, (7) and Spry1, Spry2, and Spry4 are required for correct molar cusp patterning. (18,19) In the mouse incisor, which is a continuously growing tooth, Spry2 and Spry4 restrict the differentiation of enamel-secreting ameloblasts to the labial side, allowing asymmetric enamel deposition. (20) Here, to further investigate the roles of the FGF signaling pathway in odontogenesis, we utilized a transgenic mouse line (K14-Spry4) in which the expression of mouse Spry4 is driven in the epithelium of many ectodermal organs under the control of the human keratin-14 promoter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 F, green arrowhead, Supplementary Table S3 ). While typically rodent ectopic 4th molars arise in the diastema 22 , 23 , Smoc2 −/− ectopic molars are exclusively distal (adjacent to 3rd molars), similar to Wnt10a mutants also displaying supernumerary mandibular 4th molars 24 . Roots are also consistency reduced in size, displaying taping shorter shapes (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is also possible that variation in genetic background accounts for variation in the penetrance of tooth phenotypes associated with these Sprouty null mutations (Marangoni et al 2015). Understanding why certain backgrounds display higher resilience or opposite phenotypic effects is valuable in the search for genes and genetic pathways associated with variation in the phenotypic results of known disease alleles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%