1989
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(89)90019-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and genetic parameters of carcass and meat-quality traits in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the variation in WHC may be related to the effect of HCW values on pH 24 h after slaughter, which was higher for lighter carcasses (5.74 vs. 5.59 and 5.56). We also found a negative correlation (-0.53, P < 0.01) between WHC and pH 3 h after slaughter, which agrees with More O'Ferrall et al [14], and suggests that higher rates of pH decline during the onset of rigor mortis may be related to lower values of muscle WHC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the variation in WHC may be related to the effect of HCW values on pH 24 h after slaughter, which was higher for lighter carcasses (5.74 vs. 5.59 and 5.56). We also found a negative correlation (-0.53, P < 0.01) between WHC and pH 3 h after slaughter, which agrees with More O'Ferrall et al [14], and suggests that higher rates of pH decline during the onset of rigor mortis may be related to lower values of muscle WHC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Pearson and Young [15] and More O'Ferral [14] considered that a small increase in final pH from 5.5 to 6.5 has a considerable positive effect on the WHC of meat. Thus, the variation in WHC may be related to the effect of HCW values on pH 24 h after slaughter, which was higher for lighter carcasses (5.74 vs. 5.59 and 5.56).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%