2010
DOI: 10.2298/bah1006297m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and genetic parameters of reproductive traits in Tunisian Holstein cows

Abstract: Various factors influencing reproduction in dairy Holstein cows were routinely evaluated and genetic parameters were estimated for four traits to assess fertility of artificially inseminated cows: Calving to first service interval (CFSI), calving interval (CI), calving to conception interval (CCI) and number of services per conception (NSC). Data used in this investigation consisted of records of insemination and calving events on Tunisian Holstein cows. The data included records from 1994 to 2003 in 150 herds… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
8
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As for DO, the heritability estimates obtained in this study were 0.082 and 0.090 for Holstein and Jersey cattle, respectively; this is consistent with the results reported by Pantelic et al (2011) and Ghiasi et al (2011). In contrast, some authors report very low heritability values (Estrada-León et al, 2008;M'hamdi et al, 2010;Ríos-Ultrera et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for DO, the heritability estimates obtained in this study were 0.082 and 0.090 for Holstein and Jersey cattle, respectively; this is consistent with the results reported by Pantelic et al (2011) and Ghiasi et al (2011). In contrast, some authors report very low heritability values (Estrada-León et al, 2008;M'hamdi et al, 2010;Ríos-Ultrera et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These values were higher than those reported by Ojango and Pollott (2001) and Kadarmideen et al (2000). Nevertheless, some authors (Estrada-León et al, 2008;M'hamdi et al, 2010;Ríos-Ultrera et al, 2010a) report higher repeatability values (0.120-0.180). Regarding DO, the repeatability values obtained in both breeds The correlations between CI and DO in this study for Holstein and Jersey cattle were 0.98 and 1.00, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Regarding CI, the repeatability value obtained (0.057) was nearly the same as reported by Ojango and Pollott (2001) (0.06). Nevertheless, Kadarmideen, Thompson, and Simm (2000) obtained lower value (0.049) and some authors (Estrada-León, Magana, & Segura-Correa, 2008;M'hamdi et al, 2010; Ríos-Ultrera, Calderón-Robles, Rosete-Fernández, & Lagunes-Lagunes, 2010a) report higher repeatability values (0.120-0.180). Repeatability for GL was estimated to be 0.181, which was lower than estimated repeatability by Johanson et al (2011) (0.54).…”
Section: Additive Genetic and Phenotypic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Genetic and environmental factors included in the model were designed to reflect data structure and were as inferred from the literature reporting on reproduction data analyses (Muir et al, 2004;Sewalem et al, 2010;Ghiasi et al, 2011, M'Hamdi et al, 2011. Data were analyzed with a five-trait animal model.…”
Section: Genetic Analysis and Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of genetic parameters for milk, fat, and protein yields from Tunisian data are reported in several publications (Ben Gara et al, 2006;Hammami et al, 2007Hammami et al, , 2008. However, genetic parameters for fertility traits were rarely investigated (M'Hamdi et al, 2011). Most of the culling has consistently been explained with unsatisfactory fertility performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%