2013
DOI: 10.1186/1476-0711-12-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and genotypic comparison of ESBL production by Vaginal Escherichia coli isolates from pregnant and non-pregnant women

Abstract: BackgroundVaginal Escherichia coli is a reservoir along the fecal-vaginal-urinary/neonatal course of transmission in extraintestinal E. coli infections. They also causes genital tract infections especially vaginitis, so that detection of their antibiotic resistance is an important approach to control these infections. One important mechanism of resistance is ESBL production by Enterobacteriaceae especially Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli, which is now a worldwide problem that limits therapeutic options.Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
16
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(35 reference statements)
6
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The production of these enzymes in strains from pregnant patients has been reported by other researchers such as Ramos in 2012 and Al-Mayahie in 2013, but these authors report the phenotype in lower percentage than what we documented. 45,46 Interestingly, in the present study, the percentage of ESBL phenotype was lower than the percentage of strains resistant to β-lactams, this could indicate that UPEC strains could present other mechanisms of resistance to this family of antibiotics, as the production of an altered penicillin binding proteins (PBP) which decrease the affinity of the antibiotic for PBP or efflux pumps that lead to bacterial survival and therapeutic failure. 47,48 The predominant virulence factors present in pregnant and non-pregnant women of both states were those involved in adhesion and iron acquisition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The production of these enzymes in strains from pregnant patients has been reported by other researchers such as Ramos in 2012 and Al-Mayahie in 2013, but these authors report the phenotype in lower percentage than what we documented. 45,46 Interestingly, in the present study, the percentage of ESBL phenotype was lower than the percentage of strains resistant to β-lactams, this could indicate that UPEC strains could present other mechanisms of resistance to this family of antibiotics, as the production of an altered penicillin binding proteins (PBP) which decrease the affinity of the antibiotic for PBP or efflux pumps that lead to bacterial survival and therapeutic failure. 47,48 The predominant virulence factors present in pregnant and non-pregnant women of both states were those involved in adhesion and iron acquisition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Species by Multiplex PCR Analysis. All confirmed E. coli and Klebsiella isolates were screened for the presence of the blaCTX-M, blaOXA, blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCMY, blaCMY-1, and blaCMY-2 ESBL producing genes determinants using previously described PCR protocol [26,27]. e primer sequences, targeted genes, amplicon sizes, and PCR conditions are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Detection Of Esbl Genes In E Coli and Klebsiellamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening for ESBL genes, TEM, SHV, and CTX-M, was done by a conventional, multiplex, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with PCR master mix (DreamTaq Green PCR Master Mix; Thermo Scientific) using specific primers (Table 1). [31][32][33][34] The cycling parameters were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, 45°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The amplified PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel in 0.5 • TBE buffer.…”
Section: Molecular Detection Of B-lactamase Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%