2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and genotypic study on antimicrobial resistance patterns of E. coli isolates from bovine mastitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
14
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous reports,5 6 10 42 the isolates from the present study were mainly of phylogenetic groups A and B1, with the exception of isolates belonging to phylogroup C, which were not identified in earlier studies that restricted classifications to four main phylogenetic groups A, B1, B2 and D 43. Phylogroup C is closely related to group B1, but before its recognition as a distinct phylogroup its members were classified within group A 44.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In line with previous reports,5 6 10 42 the isolates from the present study were mainly of phylogenetic groups A and B1, with the exception of isolates belonging to phylogroup C, which were not identified in earlier studies that restricted classifications to four main phylogenetic groups A, B1, B2 and D 43. Phylogroup C is closely related to group B1, but before its recognition as a distinct phylogroup its members were classified within group A 44.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…sul3 -integrons are widely distributed within commensal and pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae from humans [ 54 ], a range of food animals including cattle [ 55 ], swine [ 8 ] and poultry [ 56 ] and white stork [ 46 ]. The sul3 gene was reported not only from specimens collected in animal farms, but also from surface sediment in lakes where Cu and Zn resistance genes [ 57 ] were present, and wetlands constructed to treat pig manure [ 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfonamineresistant genes (sul) have also spread widely for these reason. Analogously, with regard to the detection rate of sul, we compared several recent studies [23][24][25][26] found that the detection rate of sulfonamineresistant genes was high and that the detection rate of sul1 and sul2 in sulfamine-resistant genes was generally higher than that of sul3. It was suggested that there may be more sulfamine-resistant bacteria in Nanning, and we should pay more attention to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%