2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and Histopathological Tumor Characteristics According to CDKN2A Mutation Status among Affected Members of Melanoma Families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results for US melanoma-prone families are consistent with two prior studies that reported the phenotypic characteristics for CDKN2A (n ¼ 670 individuals; Taylor et al, 2016) and CDK4 (n ¼ 140 individuals; Puntervoll et al, 2013) carriers from North America, Europe, and Global P-value adjusting for age at diagnosis, gender, and superficial spreading melanoma subtype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results for US melanoma-prone families are consistent with two prior studies that reported the phenotypic characteristics for CDKN2A (n ¼ 670 individuals; Taylor et al, 2016) and CDK4 (n ¼ 140 individuals; Puntervoll et al, 2013) carriers from North America, Europe, and Global P-value adjusting for age at diagnosis, gender, and superficial spreading melanoma subtype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…CDKN2A and CDK4 carriers in melanoma-prone families also demonstrated a high frequency of superficial spreading melanomas, which is consistent with prior studies (Sargen et al, 2015;Taylor et al, 2016). This association suggests that alterations of the CDKN2A(p16)/CDK4 pathway are important in the development of tumors with this histologic subtype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…published) impact on the biological function of CDKN2A or bioinformatically inferred deleterious impact on CDKN2A function, and evidence of cosegregation within melanoma families. Variants not meeting any of these criteria were classified as benign (Taylor et al , 2016). Individual participants were classified based on presence of a pathogenic mutation; benign variant carriers and wildtype individuals were combined for analyses and classified as having “no known pathogenic” mutations at CDKN2A .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GenoMEL used a common protocol to obtain research data as previously described. [10] Written informed consent was obtained from each participant, and individual GenoMEL centers received study approval from their respective institutional review boards. Consenting participants completed a self-administered questionnaire that solicited information on phenotypic characteristics, and personal and family history of melanoma and other cancers.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consenting participants completed a self-administered questionnaire that solicited information on phenotypic characteristics, and personal and family history of melanoma and other cancers. [10,11]…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%