2011
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00736-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic and Immunologic Comparison of Clade B Transmitted/Founder and Chronic HIV-1 Envelope Glycoproteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

22
130
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
22
130
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, it is critical to know whether transmitted viruses possess unique biological properties that predispose them to establish new infections more efficiently. This is a controversial topic, because some studies have reported TF-specific traits (22,24,26,52,(55)(56)(57), whereas others have failed to confirm these results (27,28,53,58,59). Some of these discrepancies are likely due to the fact that most previous analyses did not compare HIV-1 strains from transmission pairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, it is critical to know whether transmitted viruses possess unique biological properties that predispose them to establish new infections more efficiently. This is a controversial topic, because some studies have reported TF-specific traits (22,24,26,52,(55)(56)(57), whereas others have failed to confirm these results (27,28,53,58,59). Some of these discrepancies are likely due to the fact that most previous analyses did not compare HIV-1 strains from transmission pairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…in activated CD4 + T cells but not macrophages (14,(22)(23)(24)(25). Moreover, analysis of a comprehensive panel of infectious molecular clones (IMCs) showed that TF viruses packaged more envelope glycoprotein (Env), exhibited greater infectivity, bound to monocyte-derived dendritic cells more efficiently, and replicated to higher titers in CD4 + T cells in the presence of the type 1 interferon IFNα2 than chronic control (CC) viruses (26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has made it possible to seek genotypic and phenotypic differences between T/F Env proteins and those derived from chronically infected individuals (chronic control [CC] Envs). Several phenotypic characteristics are clearly associated with transmission: T/F Envs virtually always use CCR5 rather than CXCR4 or other noncanonical coreceptors (2,(16)(17)(18) and generally infect T cells but not macrophages (2,13,15,19) as a result of requiring relatively high levels of CD4 to mediate virus entry (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Other phenotypic and genotypic traits that have been linked to transmission are less well defined: Envs isolated from acute infection have sometimes been reported to be more neutralization sensitive (19), have on average fewer putative N-linked glycosylation sites (1,26), and have shorter variable loops (1,(27)(28)(29) compared to Envs isolated from chronically infected individuals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is relevant because, at least for clade B, there is evidence that sequences from individuals with acute HIV infection are more sensitive to VRC01-mediated neutralization than those from individuals with chronic HIV infection. 23 Moreover, the model does not account for the fact that AMP participants are exposed to HIV-1 quasispecies and VRC01 may need to neutralize all resistant variants or at least all resistant variants of some unknown minimum prevalence in the quasispecies. 26 Our sensitivity analyses in Figure 6 address the possibility that AMP participants are exposed to viruses (or virus variants) more resistant to VRC01-mediated neutralization than those in the panel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%