Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility of environmental bacteria from mastitic milk of pastured dairy cows of S. Miguel (Azores)

Simões, João; Branco, M.; Andrade, Jeannie I; Müller, Alexandra

doi:10.1007/s11250-019-02028-4

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In Europe, the Swiss study by R € uegsegger et al ( 2014) stood out with high proportions of S. uberis and S. dysgalactiae isolates (36.2% and 39.9%, respectively) being spiramycin resistant. As for other antimicrobials, this study reported %RI, meaning data may not be comparable with those of other studies, especially as a Portuguese study found a massive 30.8% of S. uberis isolates to be spiramycin intermediate (Simoes et al, 2020). However, it is more than twice the proportion (%RI) observed in for example France (RESAPATH (ANSES), 2020).…”

Section: Germ-vet (Germanycontrasting

confidence: 67%

Assessment of animal diseases caused by bacteria resistant to antimicrobials: cattle

Nielsen¹,

Bicout²,

Calistri³

et al. 2021

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this opinion, the antimicrobial resistant bacteria responsible for transmissible diseases that constitute a threat to the health of cattle have been assessed. The assessment has been performed following a methodology based on information collected by an extensive literature review and expert judgement. Details of the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. A global state of play on antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli (non‐VTEC), Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus uberis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, Histophilus somni, Mycoplasma bovis, Moraxella bovis, Fusobacterium necrophorum and Trueperella pyogenes is provided. Among those bacteria, EFSA identified E. coli and S. aureus with ≥ 66% certainty as being the most relevant antimicrobial resistant bacteria in cattle in the EU based on the available evidence. The animal health impact of these most relevant bacteria, as well as their eligibility for being listed and categorised within the animal health law framework will be assessed in separate scientific opinions.

show abstract

Section: Germ-vet (Germanycontrasting

confidence: 67%