2011
DOI: 10.1179/joc.2011.23.3.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic Changes in a Laboratory-Derived Ertapenem-ResistantEscherichia coliStrain

Abstract: The aim of this study was to identify phenotypic changes in a laboratory-derived strain of ertapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (Ec-ERT) when compared to its susceptible parent strain (Ec-WT). In both strains, we assessed both the effects of ertapenem via time-kill curves and the occurrence of cross resistance with other beta-lactams. The strains were compared based on growth pattern, biochemical-physiological profile and changes in the subproteome using 2D-DIGE followed by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS. To assess virulenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale for selecting RS307, is to compare ‘naturally induced’ resistance in RS307 with that of ATCC19606. Comparative proteomics has been used as an approach to understand the resistance mechanism in the microorganisms where the ATCC strain was considered as a reference (susceptible) strain [31], [32], [17], [11]. We have also performed proteomics of clinical resistant strains with lower MICs: RS122 with MIC, 32 µg/ml and RS259 with MIC, 1 µg/ml.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for selecting RS307, is to compare ‘naturally induced’ resistance in RS307 with that of ATCC19606. Comparative proteomics has been used as an approach to understand the resistance mechanism in the microorganisms where the ATCC strain was considered as a reference (susceptible) strain [31], [32], [17], [11]. We have also performed proteomics of clinical resistant strains with lower MICs: RS122 with MIC, 32 µg/ml and RS259 with MIC, 1 µg/ml.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies examining the mechanisms of carbapenem-resistance have involved controlled laboratory-derived strains; however, studies involving clinical isolates have not clearly defined the contributions of the MBL, AmpC cephalosporinase, alterations of the OprD porin or efflux systems to carbapenem-resistance [11,15]. In this report, we analyzed the mechanisms of carbapenem-resistance in clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant P .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%