2012
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic landscapes: phenological patterns in wild and cultivated barley

Abstract: Phenotypic variation in natural populations is the outcome of the joint effects of environmentally induced adaptations and neutral processes on the genetic architecture of quantitative traits. In this study, we examined the role of adaptation in shaping wild barley phenotypic variation along different environmental gradients. Detailed phenotyping of 164 wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) accessions from Israel (of the Barley1K collection) and 18 cultivated barley (H. vulgare) varieties was conducted in common ga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The longer period at both high and low MDT8 might reflect a constricted growing season at both extremes. Consistent with the idea that temperature at the site of origin may be a selection force on photoperiodic flowering, strong correlations between flowering time and MDT1 have been reported for the B1K lines (Hübner et al, 2013). Although in our experiments we measured circadian rhythms in constant light and in natural conditions plants grow under daily light/dark (diel) conditions, it is possible that the differences we observed in period length may affect the expression of photoperiod components in diel conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The longer period at both high and low MDT8 might reflect a constricted growing season at both extremes. Consistent with the idea that temperature at the site of origin may be a selection force on photoperiodic flowering, strong correlations between flowering time and MDT1 have been reported for the B1K lines (Hübner et al, 2013). Although in our experiments we measured circadian rhythms in constant light and in natural conditions plants grow under daily light/dark (diel) conditions, it is possible that the differences we observed in period length may affect the expression of photoperiod components in diel conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We have reported previously that, in Arabidopsis, when plants are grown under stressful high-density conditions, the next generation has higher amplitude rhythms, suggesting that the stressful conditions may select for amplitude (Yerushalmi et al, 2011). Supporting the idea that the selective force of the environmental conditions may impact different aspects of barley growth and development, Db at the site of origin is strongly correlated with plant size but not with flowering time in the B1K wild barley lines (Hübner et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, they worked with wild barley, whereas this study employed a landrace and an elite cultivar. Wild barley holds much more diversity than cultivated types, with considerable variation in physiological and phenotypic characteristics, and presents specific environmental adaptations to stress like temperature and rainfall (Ellis et al, 2000; Hübner et al, 2013). Therefore, it is feasible that the responses to abiotic stresses of wild barley are different to those of cultivated genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, alleles contributing to more extensive root growth and distribution may be present in cultivated varieties of rice rather than in wild species if observations from container-grown plants hold (Liu et al, 2004). Introgression of alleles from modern varieties reduces the negative effects of linkage drag from the use of wild species and landraces (Hübner et al, 2013). Nonetheless, landrace varieties for certain species may also show potential for introgression of genetic diversity into modern varieties.…”
Section: Genetics Of Root Traits Under Droughtmentioning
confidence: 99%