2018
DOI: 10.1653/024.101.0307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic Structure of Colombian Populations ofAnastrepha fraterculusComplex (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But in case of the present study, all the other variables (environment and diet) were kept constant, so, the phenotypic variability due to the existence of genetic differences amongst the populations cannot be ruled out, as also hinted by Chakravarty et al (2020). Similarly, Canal et al (2018) observed significant morphological variability in geographically isolated Colombian populations of the fruit fly, Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) reared under the same laboratory conditions, and thus also concluded about possible involvement of genetic factors in the expression of such differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…But in case of the present study, all the other variables (environment and diet) were kept constant, so, the phenotypic variability due to the existence of genetic differences amongst the populations cannot be ruled out, as also hinted by Chakravarty et al (2020). Similarly, Canal et al (2018) observed significant morphological variability in geographically isolated Colombian populations of the fruit fly, Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) reared under the same laboratory conditions, and thus also concluded about possible involvement of genetic factors in the expression of such differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The description of A. mucronota lacks information for most of the characters of the pseudocepalon (Table 2) and most of the available data overlap with those of A. nolazcoae (Table 3, 4). Anastrepha nolazcoae differs from five morphotypes within the A. fraterculus complex (Canal et al 2015(Canal et al , 2018 and A. striata as follows: 1) greater number of oral ridges (16-19; see the dichotomous key in Steck et al 1990), except unknown for Andean and Peruvian morphotypes of A. fraterculus complex; 2) posterior margin of oral ridges fringed in A. nolazcoae, irregularly serrate in A. fraterculus (Brazil-1 and Ecuadorian morphotypes), scalloped or emarginate in A. fraterculus (Mexican morphotype), entire or serrate in A. striata; and 3) approximately 36 accessory plates with fringed posterior margins in A. nolazcoae, apparently seven plates and serrate in A. fraterculus (Ecuadorian morphotypes; see plate 4b in White and Elson-Harris 1992), eight plates and serrate in A. fraterculus (Mexican morphotype), 8-9 plates and entire in A. striata. Anastrepha nolazcoae differs further from the A. fraterculus complex in having a greater number of tubules on the prothoracic spiracle (18-21 vs. 9-18 in fraterculus complex, see Rodriguez et al 2021), although in this character it overlaps with A. striata.…”
Section: Anastrepha Nolazcoaementioning
confidence: 99%