2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carpath.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenotypic variations in carriers of predicted protein-truncating genetic variants in MYBPC3: an autopsy-based case series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…86 Postmortem genetic testing (the so-called molecular autopsy) is now scientifically feasible, although the financing of these studies is problematic. 87 89 Blood or fresh tissue samples for DNA and RNA analysis are still preferable. But technological progress is making it increasingly feasible to perform genetic analyses on FFPET.…”
Section: Ongoing Risks and Opportunities For The Autopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…86 Postmortem genetic testing (the so-called molecular autopsy) is now scientifically feasible, although the financing of these studies is problematic. 87 89 Blood or fresh tissue samples for DNA and RNA analysis are still preferable. But technological progress is making it increasingly feasible to perform genetic analyses on FFPET.…”
Section: Ongoing Risks and Opportunities For The Autopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reports considered sudden unknown deaths in which autopsy findings revealed a normal heart . Fewer studies have included hearts with cardiomyopathy phenotypes . Therefore, genetic evaluation often centered on arrhythmia genes, with limited phenotyping in the decedent or the family.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williams et al conducted a postmortem analysis on two males with HOCM in whom heart weight was found to be 890 g and 980 g, respectively [ 16 ]. When converted into a ratio of heart weight to BMI, which is thought to be a strong predictor of heart weight, the ratios were 34.9 (890/25.5) and 23.6 (980/41.6) [ 16 ]. The latter ratio is comparable to the present donor’s ratio at 22.5 (510.1/22.7), suggesting that this case is consistent with prior reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%