“…The reaction course was monitored by 1 H NMR spectroscopy, and the conversion was determined by integration of the corresponding resonances of the alkyne and the products. ), 6.90, 6.67 (both d, J HÀH = 1.7 Hz, 2 H, =CHN), 6.72 (overlapped, H p-py (b) ), 6.43 (t, J HÀH = 6.5 Hz, 2 H, H ppy(a) ), 6.41, 6.27 (both dd, J HÀH = 6.3, 5.2 Hz, 2 H, H m-py (b) ), 6.08 (dd, J HÀH = 6.5, 5.4 Hz, 2 H, H m-py(a) ), 3.93, 3.89, 3.84, 3.65 (all sept, J HÀH = 6.5 Hz, 4 H, CHMe IPr ), 1.78, 1.76, 1.56, 1.53, 1.23, 1.19, 1.10, 1.08 (all d, J HÀH = 6.5 Hz, 24 H, CHMe IPr ), 0.43 (s, 9 H, H SiÀMe ), À16.47 ppm (d, J RhÀH = 21.6 Hz, 1 H, RhÀH); 13 Computational details: The geometry of all structures was optimized with the G09 program package [42] at the DFT level by using the B3LYP approximation [43] combined with the 6-31GA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (d,p) basis set for H, C, N, Cl, and Si atoms [44] and the SDD pseudo-potential [45] for the Rh atoms. The nature of the stationary points was confirmed by frequency analysis, and the intrinsic reaction paths were traced by connecting the transition structures with the respective minima.…”