1960
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1960.tb01158.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phenylmercury Salicylate Residues in Commercial Glasshouse Tomato Crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 together with the corresponding results obtained during the 1959 season. Control values were reported earlier (Egan and Lidzey, 1960); recovery of added phenylmercur> acetate at levels corresponding to 0 050 to 0100 p.p.m were lOOztlO per cent. The tentative relationship between the approximate mercury residue (R) and the number of mercurial treatments (n) noted earlier.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 together with the corresponding results obtained during the 1959 season. Control values were reported earlier (Egan and Lidzey, 1960); recovery of added phenylmercur> acetate at levels corresponding to 0 050 to 0100 p.p.m were lOOztlO per cent. The tentative relationship between the approximate mercury residue (R) and the number of mercurial treatments (n) noted earlier.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…
EGAN and Lidzey (1960) have shown that the total mercury residue, expressed as p.p.nT. Hg on the whole fruit, present on tomatoes from crops treated with up to 8 applications of phenylmercury salicylate under commercial conditions IS unlikely to exceed 001 (n+1), where n is the number of applications.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%