2009
DOI: 10.5751/es-03020-140222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philosophical Issues in Ecology: Recent Trends and Future Directions

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Philosophy of ecology has been slow to become established as an area of philosophical interest, but it is now receiving considerable attention. This area holds great promise for the advancement of both ecology and the philosophy of science. Insights from the philosophy of science can advance ecology in a number of ways. For example, philosophy can assist with the development of improved models of ecological hypothesis testing and theory choice. Philosophy can also help ecologists understand the role … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We rely on a more traditional philosophical analysis to highlight key items for discussion and to suggest ways to frame this issue that can be used to guide further investigations, which is found in the fourth Discussion and fifth Conclusion Sections. Our framework for philosophical analysis is drawn from contemporary discussion in Philosophy of Science, including discussions of mechanisms as a form of scientific explanation [10,11,12,13], discussions of philosophy of ecosystems [14,15,16], and discussions of values in science [17,18]. This approach is easily applied to environmental issues such as ecosystem harm, and to the ways in which differences between different indicator methodologies are value-laden in their effects, since it was developed to be applied to exactly those kinds of cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We rely on a more traditional philosophical analysis to highlight key items for discussion and to suggest ways to frame this issue that can be used to guide further investigations, which is found in the fourth Discussion and fifth Conclusion Sections. Our framework for philosophical analysis is drawn from contemporary discussion in Philosophy of Science, including discussions of mechanisms as a form of scientific explanation [10,11,12,13], discussions of philosophy of ecosystems [14,15,16], and discussions of values in science [17,18]. This approach is easily applied to environmental issues such as ecosystem harm, and to the ways in which differences between different indicator methodologies are value-laden in their effects, since it was developed to be applied to exactly those kinds of cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this need not be the case. Although we will not address the ethical and philosophical debates surrounding intrinsic value covered elsewhere , Colyvan et al 2009), it appears that it is often the complexity of intrinsic and instrumental values-and the narrow interpretations of the latter-that makes the common ground they share appear smaller than it actually is. For example, although the concept of biodiversity emerges from an intrinsic context, the conservation of biodiversity is usually motivated by a wide variety of human values and choices, including existence value, which is the benefit that people receive from knowing a species, habitat, or landscape-or, in fact, all of biodiversity-exists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At a deeper level, the underlying motivations for biodiversity conservation and the provision of ecosystem services are often associated with what appear to be fundamentally different value systems (Colyvan et al 2009). Biodiversity conservation is often associated with a biocentric perspective that assigns an intrinsic value to all life on Earth (Norton 1986, Rolston 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agent-based simulation seems to be one way (Colyvan et al 2009;Caprio et al 2008). The history of computer simulation in ecology has been controversial; even so, its importance as a tool for understanding ecological complexity cannot be understated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%