2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-476-05200-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philosophie der Gefühle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pincus (2018) and Young (1990Young ( , 2011. 56 Demmerling and Landweer (2007), p. 2s96, my own translation from the German original. 57 See Gelber (2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pincus (2018) and Young (1990Young ( , 2011. 56 Demmerling and Landweer (2007), p. 2s96, my own translation from the German original. 57 See Gelber (2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One other difference between them seems to be the focus on the affective aspects of the sphere in the work of Peter Sloterdijk, in contrast to the focus on conscious reflexivity in the work of Helmuth Plessner. While Peter Sloterdijk, following the work of Hermann Schmitz (2007Schmitz ( , 2010Schmitz ( , 2011, decentres the affectivity from the individual subject to the sphere, where it also figures as an emergent relationships between different persons, without any conscious intermediation of the individual subject (Demmerling and Landweer, 2007;Fuchs, 2000), Helmuth Plessner preserves the subjective cognition and centred performativity of the individual human being, without excluding affective relationships. This is also clearly reflected in his The Limits of Community: A Critique of Social Radicalism, first published in 1924Radicalism, first published in (1999 4 .…”
Section: An Alternative Spherology: the Philosophical Anthropology Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%