Philosophy and Science: What Can I Know?

Abstract

Philosophy is a thorny subject. Many philosophical statements cannot be formally proven, resulting in clever but endless debates. Scientists usually shy away from such ambiguity and retreat into their safe world of perceived clarity. Nevertheless, the philosophical study of nature is the wellspring of science. Simply asking "What is a law of nature?" poses a philosophical challenge. The philosophy of science is concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science and how scientists conduct their research. The first attempts to systematize the scientific method was based on common sense: from observations abstract laws are found. This view turned out to be untenable and both inductive and deductive reasoning suffer from conceptual problems. Indeed, science is not an incremental process accumulating knowledge but is greatly influenced by social and cultural conditions. It comes perhaps as no surprise that an animosity exists between science and philosophy. For instance, the controversial philosopher of science, Paul Feyerabend, continually challenged the scientific establishment. Historically, the emergence of modern physics overthrew nearly every postulate of classical science and replaced them with bizarre new concepts, from elusive quantum fluctuations to the fabric of space-time. The aftershocks of this fundamental transformation still echo to this day. On the one hand the universe is, miraculously, comprehensible to the human mind, but on the other hand scientific progress appears to be slowing down. Paradoxically, every question answered raises more and harder questions and theories appear to be losing meaning. If asked, some scientists will admit to these shortcomings: uncertainty and ignorance are inherent and ubiquitous in science. The final blow to a clear foundation of knowledge comes from the discoveries that incompleteness and randomness lurk at the heart of mathematics. Level of mathematical formality: low. Science works! This is attested by the spectacular display of human technological prowess. Indeed, technological advancements, made possible by the scientific understanding of the universe, are becoming ever more disruptive and frequent. How is it then justifiable to speak of the crisis of science and even allude to the end of science?

Perjalanan Menuju Pemahaman Yang Mendalam Mengenai Ilmu Pengetahuan: Studi Filsafat Tentang Sifat Realitas

“…Paradigma baru telah muncul di sini. Tanda kelahiran dari sebuah era baru adalah adanya pergantian yang diiringi oleh perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan, kemampuan rasional dan penemuan-penemuan teknologi baru (Glattfelder, 2019).…”

“…Bagi Heidegger, realitas tidak hanya terbatas pada objek-objek fisik yang diamati, tetapi juga melibatkan hubungan manusia dengan dunia yang lebih luas. Ia mengemukakan konsep "dunia" (worldhood) yang mencakup konteks sosial, budaya, dan sejarah yang membentuk pengalaman kita tentang realitas (Glattfelder, 2019).…”

“…Dalam bidang ini, para peneliti menemukan pola dan tren dalam perilaku manusia, cara manusia berinteraksi satu sama lain, dan bagaimana sejarah membentuk budaya kita. Dengan demikian, memperoleh pemahaman tentang perkembangan dan penemuan terbaru dalam berbagai disiplin dapat membantu seseorang memperluas perspektif mereka tentang realitas, membuka pikiran mereka untuk gagasan-gagasan baru, dan membantu mereka mengatasi tantangan yang kompleks di dunia modern (Glattfelder, 2019).…”

The Ultimate Reality in the Universe: A Study on the Views of Quantum Physics and Vedanta Philosophy

“…Scientists desired to learn more about these items and comprehend the universe's fundamental components as their grasp of science advanced. They began searching inward from molecules, progressed to atoms, subatomic particles, quarks, and strings, and are now seeking the unifying force that serves as the universe's fundamental building component (Glattfelder, 2019).…”

Bridging the Gap: Decoding the Intrinsic Nature of Time in Market Data

“…Perhaps most remarkable, we find the notion of information at the foundations of reality. Information is a candidate for being an ontological primitive; that is to say, it could be one of the fundamental building blocks of reality itself, if not the only one (Glattfelder, 2019(Glattfelder, , 2025.…”