2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81010-8_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philosophy of Science as First Philosophy: The Liberal Polemics of Ernest Nagel

Abstract: This chapter explores Nagel's polemics. It shows these have a two-fold character: (i) to defend liberal civilization against all kinds of enemies. And (ii) to defend what he calls 'contextual naturalism.' And the chapter shows that (i-ii) reinforce each other and undermine alternative political and philosophical programs. The chapter's argument responds to an influential argument by George Reisch that Nagel's professional stance represents a kind of disciplinary retreat from politics. In order to respond to Re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree withSchliesser (2022) that Nagel also thinks that the philosophy of science aims to promote liberal values. As we read Nagel, his view is that the philosopher of science's use of logical analysis itself promotes liberal values, but the philosopher of science does not directly engage with such values.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We agree withSchliesser (2022) that Nagel also thinks that the philosophy of science aims to promote liberal values. As we read Nagel, his view is that the philosopher of science's use of logical analysis itself promotes liberal values, but the philosopher of science does not directly engage with such values.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…3 Nevertheless, Nagel's work fits well into the field of non-immigrant, 3 Nagel, to be sure, had a metaphysics that superficially resembles Cohen's, one that acknowledges that a "manifest plurality and variety of things, of their qualities and their American philosophy of science. Like his teacher Cohen, Nagel identifies philosophy with philosophy of science (Nagel 1954, 298;Schliesser 2022). Moreover, the issues and positions Nagel focuses on throughout his career were the critical issues we have already noted were found in Cohen's 1931 book and, as we will now see, in the work of other speculative philosophers of science.…”
Section: American Philosophy Of Science (1900-1950)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since the reform and opening up, an important change in many areas of social life is the rapid development and wide application of network technology [ 1 ]. Since the beginning of the development of network technology, it has affected all aspects of people's lives, not only profoundly changing the way of modern information dissemination, but also making earth-shaking changes in people's way of life and communication, becoming an indispensable part of modern people's life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%