2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3288-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Philosophy of Syntax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I can only hope that together with other considerations, like Tałasiewicz's recent attempt (Husserlian in spirit) to derive basic semantic categories from basic types of intentional acts (cf. Tałasiewicz, 2010), it will make the case for a precise and self-critical version of the theory that describes intentionality as essentially connected with the "characterization and explanation of action".…”
Section: Linguistic Criteria Of Intentionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I can only hope that together with other considerations, like Tałasiewicz's recent attempt (Husserlian in spirit) to derive basic semantic categories from basic types of intentional acts (cf. Tałasiewicz, 2010), it will make the case for a precise and self-critical version of the theory that describes intentionality as essentially connected with the "characterization and explanation of action".…”
Section: Linguistic Criteria Of Intentionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W książce Philosophy of Syntax (Tałasiewicz 2010) 16 podałem teorię, która jest próbą realizacji tego postulatu. Stanowi ona filozoficznie pogłębioną wersję klasycznej gramatyki kategorialnej, w której nie wszystkie przekształcenia dopuszczalne w teorii typów znajdują zastosowanie, lecz tylko te, którym można nadać specyficzny sens składniowy.…”
Section: Uniwersytet Warszawskiunclassified
“…One might refer, for example, to the well-known Bühler-Jakobson conception (although it should be viewed, I think, critically and carefullysee Levinson 1983: 41-42); another possibility would be to combine certain ideas that can be found in classical categorial grammar (cf. Tałasiewicz 2009) with the semantic and pragmatic ideas of authors such as Reichenbach (1947) and Carnap (1947). We could, thus, distinguish functor roles and contrast them with both singular and propositional roles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%