2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1220973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pho1a (plastid starch phosphorylase) is duplicated and essential for normal starch granule phenotype in tubers of Solanum tuberosum L

Abstract: Reserve starch from seeds and tubers is a crucial plant product for human survival. Much research has been devoted to quantitative and qualitative aspects of starch synthesis and its relation to abiotic factors of importance in agriculture. Certain aspects of genetic factors and enzymes influencing carbon assimilation into starch granules remain elusive after many decades of research. Starch phosphorylase (Pho) can operate, depending on metabolic conditions, in a synthetic and degradative pathway. The plastidi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the remaining PHO1b gene was not expressed in stolons and tubers, suggesting that the three PHO1a genes may be important in tuber starch degradation. Given that G1P is a precursor of starch, fine tuning of expression levels and enzyme activities of these PHO1a may have the potential to regulate starch yield in potato tubers [ 64 ]. Further research will be necessary to explore the functional implications of these observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the remaining PHO1b gene was not expressed in stolons and tubers, suggesting that the three PHO1a genes may be important in tuber starch degradation. Given that G1P is a precursor of starch, fine tuning of expression levels and enzyme activities of these PHO1a may have the potential to regulate starch yield in potato tubers [ 64 ]. Further research will be necessary to explore the functional implications of these observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%