2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonetic reduction versus phonological deletion of French schwa: Some methodological issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
31
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction of consonants and vowels is pervasive in spontaneous conversational speech, as attested in a rising number of corpus studies [Kohler, 2000;Ernestus, 2000;Johnson, 2004;Adda-Decker et al, 2005;Schuppler et al, 2011;Adda-Decker and Snoeren, 2011;Bürki et al, 2011]. In spite of the increasing interest in speech reduction phenomena, much remains to be explored about their phonetic characteristics and conditioning factors.…”
Section: Speech Reduction and Goal Of The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of consonants and vowels is pervasive in spontaneous conversational speech, as attested in a rising number of corpus studies [Kohler, 2000;Ernestus, 2000;Johnson, 2004;Adda-Decker et al, 2005;Schuppler et al, 2011;Adda-Decker and Snoeren, 2011;Bürki et al, 2011]. In spite of the increasing interest in speech reduction phenomena, much remains to be explored about their phonetic characteristics and conditioning factors.…”
Section: Speech Reduction and Goal Of The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of a large corpus of French interviews, Adda-Decker, Boula de Mareüil, Adda, and Lamel (2005) report that French vowels were completely deleted in 6% of the tokens. These extreme phonetic reductions have been shown to affect the schwa vowel as well (Bürki, Fougeron, Gendrot, & Frauenfelder, 2011b). Consequently, some of the word tokens in which no schwa can be heard necessarily result from a gradient reduction, irrespective of whether the schwa is also deleted categorically in other word tokens.…”
Section: Description and Classification Of Variation Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Fougeron et al (2007) and Burki et al (2011) found that schwa duration is 50 ms on average. In this study, schwas are on average 86 ± 17 ms long.…”
Section: Stormementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several factors which could explain this difference. First, both Fougeron et al (2007) and Burki et al (2011) are corpus-based studies of natural speech and therefore speech rate is likely to be faster. Second, schwas in these studies occur in a much wider range of prosodic contexts than in the present study and this could have an effect on mean schwa duration.…”
Section: Stormementioning
confidence: 99%